Machine translation: key concepts, evaluation processes and post-editing techniques

被引：0
|
作者：
Ferragud, Maria Ferragud
机构：
来源：
TRANS-REVISTA TRANSCULTURAL DE MUSICA | 2022年 / 26卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
J6 [音乐];
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：394 / +
页数：4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine translation: key concepts, evaluation processes and post-editing techniques
    Ferragud Ferragud, Maria
    TRANS-REVISTA DE TRADUCTOLOGIA, 2022, (26): : 394 - 397
  • [2] Post-editing of machine translation: processes and applications
    Garcia, Ignacio
    TRANSLATOR, 2015, 21 (01): : 110 - 114
  • [3] Post-editing of Machine Translation: Processes and Applications
    Folaron, Debbie
    MACHINE TRANSLATION, 2015, 29 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [4] On the correctness of machine translation: A machine translation post-editing task
    Koponen, Maarit
    Salmi, Leena
    JOURNAL OF SPECIALISED TRANSLATION, 2015, (23): : 117 - 135
  • [5] Repairing texts: Empirical investigations of machine translation post-editing processes
    Kittredge, R
    META, 2002, 47 (03) : 435 - 436
  • [6] Is machine translation post-editing worth the effort? A survey of research into post-editing and effort
    Koponen, Maarit
    JOURNAL OF SPECIALISED TRANSLATION, 2016, (25): : 131 - 148
  • [7] Post-Editing Machine Translation As an FSL Exercise
    Kliffer, Michael D.
    PORTA LINGUARUM, 2008, (09) : 53 - 67
  • [8] Cognitive effort in human translation and machine translation post-editing processes A holistic and phased view
    Wang, Yu
    Jalalian Daghigh, Ali
    FORUM-REVUE INTERNATIONALE D INTERPRETATION ET DE TRADUCTION-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTERPRETATION AND TRANSLATION, 2023, 21 (01): : 139 - 162
  • [9] Post-editing Machine Translation in MateCat: a classroom experiment
    Herget, Katrin
    7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION ADVANCES (HEAD'21), 2021, : 1003 - 1009
  • [10] PET: a Tool for Post-editing and Assessing Machine Translation
    Aziz, Wilker
    de Sousa, Sheila C. M.
    Specia, Lucia
    LREC 2012 - EIGHTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE RESOURCES AND EVALUATION, 2012, : 3982 - 3987
12345