Over the past 20 years, significant time and money have been spent on better understanding and successfully applying bioremediation in the field. The results of these efforts provide a deeper un-derstanding of aerobic and anaerobic microbial processes, the microbial species and environ-mental conditions that are desirable for specific degradation pathways, and the limitations that may prevent full-scale bioremediation from being successfully applied in heterogeneous subsur-face environments. Numerous substrates have been identified as effective electron donors to stimulate anaerobic dechlorination of chlorinated ethenes, but methods of delivering these sub-strates for in situ bioremediation (direct-push injections, slug injections, high-pressure injections, fracture wells, etc.) have yet to overcome the main limitation of achieving contact between these substrates and the contaminants. Therefore, although it is important (from a full-scale remedia-tion standpoint) to select an appropriate, low-cost substrate that can be supplied in sufficient quantity to promote remediation of a large source area and its associated plume, it is equally im-portant to ensure that the substrate can be delivered throughout the impacted plume zone. Failure to achieve substrate delivery and contact within the chlorinated solvent plume usually re-sults in wasted money and limited remediation benefit. Bioremediation is a contact technology that cannot be effectively implemented on a large scale unless a method for rapidly delivering the low-cost substrate across the entire source and plume areas is utilized. Unfortunately, many cur-rent substrate delivery methods are not achieving sitewide distribution or treatment of the sorbed contaminant mass that exists in the organic fraction of a soil matrix. The following discussion sum-marizes substrate delivery using an aggressive groundwater recirculation approach that can achieve plumewide contact between the contaminants and substrate, thus accelerating dechlori-nation rates and shortening the overall remediation time frame. (C) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.