Comparison of Different Cuff Pressure Use with the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway on Haemodynamic Response, Seal Pressure and Postoperative Adverse Events: A Prospective Randomized Study

被引:6
|
作者
Ali, Achmet [1 ]
Altun, Demet [1 ]
Sivrikoz, Nukhet [1 ]
Yornuk, Mesut [1 ]
Turgut, Namigar [2 ]
Akinci, Ibrahim Ozkan [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Univ, Istanbul Sch Med, Dept Anaesthesiol, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Okmeydani Training & Res Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Laryngeal mask airway supreme; general anaesthesia; haemodynamic response; cuff pressure; seal pressure;
D O I
10.5152/TJAR.2017.89587
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: The Supreme (TM) laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) is a supra glottic airway (SGA) device that is used as an alternative to endotracheal tubes. In the present study, we aimed to compare the use of the SLMA with normal cuff pressure and low cuff pressure, primarily for haemodynamic response. Methods: In the present study, 120 patients diagnosed with hypertension and scheduled for varicose vein or inguinal hernia operation were enrolled and 99 patients finished. Using randomization, patients were divided into two groups according to cuff pressure as a low-pressure group (Group L, 45 cm H2O) and a normal-pressure group (Group N, 60 cm H2O). Demographics, Mallampati score and the type and duration of surgery, heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), percentage of tidal volume leakage, Ppeak, Pmean, etCO(2), seal pressure, fibreoptic scores and postoperative adverse effects of all patients were recorded. Results: MAP and HR values immediately and 2 minutes after SLMA insertion were significantly lower in Group L (p<0.001). In Group L and Group N, the seal pressures were 24.1 +/- 3.1 cm H2O and 26.2 +/- 3.9 cm H2O, respectively (p=0.003). Also, blood staining and sore throat occurred less frequently in Group L (p<0.05). The fibreoptic average score, insertion features and ventilation parameters were similar between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: SLMA use with a cuff pressure of 45 cm H2O significantly decreases haemodynamic response and post-operative side effects compared with a normal cuff pressure. Therefore, except for some specific surgeries that require higher seal pressures, we recommend the use of the SLMA with cuff pressures as low as 45 cm H2O.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 157
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway unique in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?
    Jagannathan, Narasimhan
    Sohn, Lisa
    Sommers, Katherine
    Belvis, Dawn
    Shah, Ravi D.
    Sawardekar, Amod
    Eidem, Jami
    DaGraca, Justin
    Mukherji, Isabella
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2013, 23 (10) : 927 - 933
  • [2] Use of Manometry for Laryngeal Mask Airway Reduces Postoperative Pharyngolaryngeal Adverse Events A Prospective, Randomized Trial
    Seet, Edwin
    Yousaf, Farhanah
    Gupta, Smita
    Subramanyam, Rajeev
    Wong, David T.
    Chung, Frances
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 112 (03) : 652 - 657
  • [3] Postoperative Pharyngolaryngeal Adverse Events with Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA Supreme) in Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures with Cuff Pressure Limiting 25 cmH2O: Prospective, Blind, and Randomised Study
    Kang, Joo-Eun
    Oh, Chung-Sik
    Choi, JaeWon
    Son, Il Soon
    Kim, Seong-Hyop
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [4] The influence of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) cuff pressure on postoperative sore throat
    Spiro, M.
    Gross, J.
    Boomers, O.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (01) : 250 - 250
  • [5] A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
    Somri, Mostafa
    Vaida, Sonia
    Garcia Fornari, Gustavo
    Renee Mendoza, Gabriela
    Charco-Mora, Pedro
    Hawash, Naser
    Matter, Ibrahim
    Swaid, Forat
    Gaitini, Luis
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [6] A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
    Mostafa Somri
    Sonia Vaida
    Gustavo Garcia Fornari
    Gabriela Renee Mendoza
    Pedro Charco-Mora
    Naser Hawash
    Ibrahim Matter
    Forat Swaid
    Luis Gaitini
    BMC Anesthesiology, 16
  • [7] A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and the single-use Soft Seal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway
    Hanning, SJ
    McCulloch, TJ
    Orr, B
    Anderson, SP
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2006, 34 (02) : 237 - 239
  • [8] Effects of cuff pressure on changes in airway morphology after use of the laryngeal mask airway
    Seijiro Sonoda
    Toyoki Kugimiya
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2003, 17 (2) : 133 - 135
  • [9] Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial
    Zhang, Lianfeng
    Seet, Edwin
    Mehta, Vanita
    Subramanyam, Rajeev
    Ankichetty, Saravanan P.
    Wong, David T.
    Chung, Frances
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2011, 58 (07): : 624 - 629
  • [10] Erratum to: A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
    Mostafa Somri
    Sonia Vaida
    Gustavo Garcia Fornari
    Gabriela Renee Mendoza
    Pedro Charco-Mora
    Naser Hawash
    Ibrahim Matter
    Forat Swaid
    Luis Gaitini
    BMC Anesthesiology, 16