Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Lianfeng [1 ]
Seet, Edwin [2 ]
Mehta, Vanita [1 ]
Subramanyam, Rajeev [1 ]
Ankichetty, Saravanan P. [1 ]
Wong, David T. [1 ]
Chung, Frances [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Khoo Teck Puat Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Alexandra Hlth Private Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
HOME-READINESS;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-011-9514-6
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background A higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) is a marker of efficacy and safety when using laryngeal mask airway devices. The new disposable laryngeal mask airway (LMA (TM)) Supreme (TM) has lower OLP compared with the LMA ProSeal (TM). Increased intracuff pressure of laryngeal mask airway devices may improve OLP but may result in more postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events. This study was designed to compare the OLP of the LMA Supreme at varying intracuff pressures. Methods One hundred and twenty-three patients were divided randomly into three groups. General anesthesia was standardized using a propofol-fentanyl induction and desflurane in air-oxygen for maintenance. Intracuff pressures of the LMA Supreme were adjusted to 80 cm H2O, 60 cm H2O, and 40 cm H2O according to group allocation. The primary outcome was OLP. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events and the satisfaction scores of patients and anesthesiologists. The OLP was compared amongst groups using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. All reported P values are two-sided. Results The OLP with an intracuff pressure of 80 cm H2O was significantly higher compared with 60 cm H2O and 40 cm H2O (26 [6] vs 20 [6] vs 18 [5] cm H2O, respectively; P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events (P = 0.6), patient satisfaction scores (P = 0.2), and anesthesiologist satisfaction scores (P = 0.8) were comparable amongst the three groups. Conclusion An intracuff pressure of 80 cm H2O with the LMA Supreme is associated with a higher OLP compared with 60 cm H2O or 40 cm H2O without a greater incidence of postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events. For a superior glottic seal when using the LMA Supreme, we recommend intracuff pressures up to 80 cm H2O.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 629
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laryngeal mask airway protector generates higher oropharyngeal leak pressures compared to the laryngeal mask airway supreme: A randomized clinical trial in the ambulatory surgery unit
    Acx, Emilie
    Van Caelenberg, Els
    De Baerdemaeker, Luc
    Coppens, Marc
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 37 (02) : 221 - 225
  • [2] The randomized crossover comparison of airway sealing with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at three different intracuff pressures in children
    Choi, Kwan-Woong
    Lee, Jeong-Rim
    Oh, Jung-Tak
    Kim, Dong Wook
    Kim, Min-Soo
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2014, 24 (10) : 1080 - 1087
  • [3] Comparison of Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme and Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal with respect to oropharyngeal leak pressure during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial
    Belena, Jose M.
    Nunez, Monica
    Anta, Diego
    Carnero, Maria
    Gracia, Jose L.
    Ayala, Jose L.
    Alvarez, Raquel
    Yuste, Javier
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 30 (03) : 119 - 123
  • [4] The Influence of Mouth Opening on Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure, Intracuff Pressure, and Cuff Position With the Laryngeal Mask Airway
    Sanuki, Takuro
    Sugioka, Shingo
    Hirokane, Motoko
    Son, Hiroki
    Uda, Rumiko
    Akatsuka, Masafumi
    Kotani, Junichiro
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2010, 68 (05) : 1038 - 1042
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial
    Seet, Edwin
    Rajeev, Subramanyam
    Firoz, Tamal
    Yousaf, Farhanah
    Wong, Jean
    Wong, David T.
    Chung, Frances
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2010, 27 (07) : 602 - 607
  • [6] Effects of Peak Inspiratory Pressure-Guided Setting of Intracuff Pressure for Laryngeal Mask Airway Supreme™ Use during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Wang, Mao-Hua
    Zhang, Dong-Sheng
    Zhou, Wei
    Tian, Shun-Ping
    Zhou, Tian-Qi
    Sui, Wei
    Zhang, Zhuan
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (10) : 1137 - 1144
  • [7] A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme and laryngeal mask airway unique in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?
    Jagannathan, Narasimhan
    Sohn, Lisa
    Sommers, Katherine
    Belvis, Dawn
    Shah, Ravi D.
    Sawardekar, Amod
    Eidem, Jami
    DaGraca, Justin
    Mukherji, Isabella
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2013, 23 (10) : 927 - 933
  • [8] Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trialLa pression de fuite oropharyngienne avec le masque laryngé Supreme™ à différentes pressions intra-ballonnet: une étude randomisée contrôlée
    Lianfeng Zhang
    Edwin Seet
    Vanita Mehta
    Rajeev Subramanyam
    Saravanan P. Ankichetty
    David T. Wong
    Frances Chung
    Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2011, 58 (7): : 624 - 629
  • [9] Head elevation and laryngeal mask airway Supreme insertion: A randomized controlled trial
    Park, Jun-Young
    Yu, Jihion
    Hong, Jun Hyuk
    Hwang, Jai-Hyun
    Kim, Young-Kug
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 65 (03) : 343 - 350
  • [10] A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: Ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure
    Buckham, M
    Brooker, M
    Brimacombe, J
    Keller, C
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1999, 27 (06) : 628 - 631