Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ at different intracuff pressures: a randomized controlled trial

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, Lianfeng [1 ]
Seet, Edwin [2 ]
Mehta, Vanita [1 ]
Subramanyam, Rajeev [1 ]
Ankichetty, Saravanan P. [1 ]
Wong, David T. [1 ]
Chung, Frances [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Univ Hlth Network, Dept Anesthesia, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Khoo Teck Puat Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Alexandra Hlth Private Ltd, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
HOME-READINESS;
D O I
10.1007/s12630-011-9514-6
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background A higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) is a marker of efficacy and safety when using laryngeal mask airway devices. The new disposable laryngeal mask airway (LMA (TM)) Supreme (TM) has lower OLP compared with the LMA ProSeal (TM). Increased intracuff pressure of laryngeal mask airway devices may improve OLP but may result in more postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events. This study was designed to compare the OLP of the LMA Supreme at varying intracuff pressures. Methods One hundred and twenty-three patients were divided randomly into three groups. General anesthesia was standardized using a propofol-fentanyl induction and desflurane in air-oxygen for maintenance. Intracuff pressures of the LMA Supreme were adjusted to 80 cm H2O, 60 cm H2O, and 40 cm H2O according to group allocation. The primary outcome was OLP. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events and the satisfaction scores of patients and anesthesiologists. The OLP was compared amongst groups using analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction. All reported P values are two-sided. Results The OLP with an intracuff pressure of 80 cm H2O was significantly higher compared with 60 cm H2O and 40 cm H2O (26 [6] vs 20 [6] vs 18 [5] cm H2O, respectively; P < 0.001). The incidence of postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events (P = 0.6), patient satisfaction scores (P = 0.2), and anesthesiologist satisfaction scores (P = 0.8) were comparable amongst the three groups. Conclusion An intracuff pressure of 80 cm H2O with the LMA Supreme is associated with a higher OLP compared with 60 cm H2O or 40 cm H2O without a greater incidence of postoperative pharyngolaryngeal adverse events. For a superior glottic seal when using the LMA Supreme, we recommend intracuff pressures up to 80 cm H2O.
引用
收藏
页码:624 / 629
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Influence of cuff volume on oropharyngeal leak pressure and fibreoptic position with the laryngeal mask airway
    Keller, C
    Pühringer, F
    Brimacombe, JR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 81 (02) : 186 - 187
  • [22] A comparison of the oropharyngeal leak pressure between the reusable Classic™ Laryngeal Mask Airway and the single-use Soft Seal™ Laryngeal Mask Airway
    Hanning, SJ
    McCulloch, TJ
    Orr, B
    Anderson, SP
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 2006, 34 (02) : 237 - 239
  • [23] A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure (vol 16, 87, 2016)
    Somri, Mostafa
    Vaida, Sonia
    Garcia Fornari, Gustavo
    Renee Mendoza, Gabriela
    Charco-Mora, Pedro
    Hawash, Naser
    Matter, Ibrahim
    Swaid, Forat
    Gaitini, Luis
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2016, 16
  • [24] Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients
    Keller, C
    Brimacombe, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 85 (02) : 262 - 266
  • [25] Teaching airway management with laryngeal mask: randomized controlled trial
    Pedersoli, Cesar Eduardo
    Martins Pedersoli, Tatiane Aparecida
    Mancussi e Faro, Ana Cristina
    Barcellos Dalri, Maria Celia
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2016, 69 (02) : 345 - 351
  • [26] A randomised trial comparing the laryngeal mask airway Supreme™ with the laryngeal mask airway Unique™ in children
    Jagannathan, N.
    Sohn, L. E.
    Sawardekar, A.
    Chang, E.
    Langen, K. E.
    Anderson, K.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2012, 67 (02) : 139 - 144
  • [27] Pharyngeal morbidity and the high intracuff pressure of classic laryngeal mask airway
    Thangaswamy, Chitra Rajeswari
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2008, 107 (03): : 1083 - 1084
  • [28] Oropharyngeal leak pressure of the LMA Protector™ vs the LMA Supreme™; a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Moser, Berthold
    Keller, Christian
    Audige, Laurent
    Bruppacher, Heinz R.
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2019, 63 (03) : 322 - 328
  • [29] Intracuff pressures after following the manufacturers instructions: a comparison between the laryngeal tube and the laryngeal mask airway
    Wrobel, M.
    Wagner, S.
    Bauer, C.
    Kreuer, S.
    Eichner, A.
    Grundmann, U.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 66 - 66
  • [30] A Randomized Crossover Comparison of Airway Sealing with the Laryngeal Mask Airway Ambu AuraFlex at Three Intracuff Pressures in Pediatric Laparoscopic Surgery
    Liu, Xiang
    Tan, Xiaona
    Zhang, Qi
    Qiao, Li
    Shi, Lei
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2021, 38 (03) : 231 - 236