Climate Change Mitigation Options in the Italian Livestock Sector

被引:17
|
作者
Coderoni, Silvia [1 ]
Valli, Laura [2 ]
Canavari, Maurizio [3 ]
机构
[1] Italian Natl Inst Agr Econ, Rome, Italy
[2] Res Ctr Anim Prod CRPA, Rome, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Bologna, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1746-692X.12077
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
According to official figures, estimated using the UNFCCC methodology, the agricultural sector is responsible for around 10 per cent of EU-15 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, these figures rise substantially if we consider the lifecycle of a product, from the cradle to the farm gate. This study investigates six livestock products in Italy, in order to estimate their carbon footprint and to explore their mitigation potential. The products analysed were fresh milk, milk for Parmigiano-Reggiano cheese, beef, pork, eggs and poultry. Their carbon footprint was estimated using a Life Cycle Assessment approach. Although mitigation measures on the supply side are the focus of European agricultural and climate policies, the study shows that the potential of each individual action is quite limited, due to technical constraints. Nevertheless, some mitigation options can also reduce production costs, generating a win-win situation between public and private benefits. Dissemination programmes, which will be examined in 2015, are important to raise awareness among farmers about climate change scenarios in the agricultural sector and to build capacity for cost-saving mitigation options. The demand side is also being explored in 2015 to evaluate the mitigation potential, through experimental auctions, of consumer willingness to pay for livestock products with a carbon footprint label.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:17 / 24
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Climate change mitigation options and directed technical change: A decentralized equilibrium analysis
    Grimaud, Andre
    Lafforgue, Gilles
    Magne, Bertrand
    RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (04) : 938 - 962
  • [32] Role of the Freight Sector in Future Climate Change Mitigation Scenarios
    Muratori, Matteo
    Smith, Steven J.
    Kyle, Page
    Link, Robert
    Mignone, Bryan K.
    Kheshgi, Haroon S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (06) : 3526 - 3533
  • [33] Climate Change Mitigation Performance in the EU Tourism Destination Sector
    Streimikiene, Dalia
    Kyriakopoulos, Grigorios L.
    JOURNAL OF TOURISM AND SERVICES, 2024, 15 (28): : 268 - 284
  • [34] Bangladesh: Climate Change Issues, Mitigation, and Adaptation in the Water Sector
    Haque, Shama E.
    Nahar, Nazmun
    ACS ES&T WATER, 2023, 3 (06): : 1484 - 1501
  • [35] Valorization Methodology for Agriculture Sector Climate Change Mitigation Measures
    Gancone, Agita
    Pubule, Jelena
    Blumberga, Dagnija
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND CLIMATE TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 25 (01) : 944 - 954
  • [36] Assessment of climate change mitigation potential of the Macedonian transport sector
    Dedinec, Aleksandar
    Markovska, Natasa
    Taseska, Verica
    Duic, Neven
    Kanevce, Gligor
    ENERGY, 2013, 57 : 177 - 187
  • [37] Cost of climate change mitigation in Canada's forest sector
    Lempriere, Tony C.
    Krcmar, Emina
    Rampley, Greg J.
    Beatch, Alison
    Smyth, Carolyn E.
    Hafer, Mark
    Kurz, Werner A.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2017, 47 (05) : 604 - 614
  • [38] On the role of forests and the forest sector for climate change mitigation in Sweden
    Petersson, Hans
    Ellison, David
    Mensah, Alex Appiah
    Berndes, Goran
    Egnell, Gustaf
    Lundblad, Mattias
    Lundmark, Tomas
    Lundstrom, Anders
    Stendahl, Johan
    Wikberg, Per-Erik
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2022, 14 (07): : 793 - 813
  • [39] Climate Change-Challenges and Response Options for the Port Sector
    Azarkamand, Sahar
    Balbaa, Alsnosy
    Wooldridge, Christopher
    Mari Darbra, Rosa
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (17)
  • [40] Trend and priority change of climate change mitigation technology in the global mining sector
    Yamashita, Andre S.
    Fujii, Hidemichi
    RESOURCES POLICY, 2022, 78