Linear dimensional accuracy of a polyvinyl siloxane of varying viscosities using different impression techniques

被引:6
|
作者
Mishra, Sunil [1 ]
Chowdhary, Ramesh [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Dent Coll Azamgarh, Dept Maxillofacial Prosthodont & Implantol, Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] S Nijalingappa Inst Dent Sci & Res, Dept Maxillofacial Prosthodont, Gulbarga 585102, Karnataka, India
关键词
custom tray; dimensional accuracy; impression; polyvinyl siloxane; stock tray;
D O I
10.1111/j.2041-1626.2010.00004.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Aim: The present study is an in vitro study to evaluate the linear dimensional accuracy of commercially available polyvinyl siloxanes of varying viscosities using different impression techniques. Methods: Different impression techniques used were: (a) putty wash, with a two-step technique with polyethylene spacer, using a stock tray; (b) putty wash, with a one-step technique, using a stock tray; (c) single-mix technique, utilizing medium viscosity in a custom tray; and (d) multiple-mix technique, utilizing a heavy- and low-viscosity combination in a custom tray. For each technique, 10 impressions were made of a metallic maxillary dentulous master model. Results: The result of this study dictates that a heavy- and low-viscosity combination, double-mix technique in a custom tray produced an accurate result in all dimensions, followed by the single-mix technique, utilizing medium viscosity in a custom tray, and the putty wash two-step technique with polyethylene spacer, using a stock tray. Group 2 putty wash, one-step, simultaneous technique produced the least accurate result in all dimensions. Conclusion: The putty wash two-step techniques were found to be as accurate as the multiple-mix technique, utilizing a heavy- and low-viscosity combination in a custom tray, and the single-mix technique, utilizing medium viscosity in a custom tray. Making custom trays is time consuming and costly.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 46
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Transfer Impression Techniques for Osseointegrated Implants
    Zen, Bruno Massucato
    Soares, Eveline Freitas
    Rodrigues, Mariana Agustinho
    Luthi, Leonardo Flores
    Consani, Rafael Leonardo X.
    Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz
    Pessanha Henriques, Guilherme Elias
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2015, 41 (06) : 662 - 667
  • [22] Evaluation of the accuracy of different transfer impression techniques for multiple implants
    Brigolini de Faria, Julio Cesar
    Silva-Concilio, Lais Regiane
    Claro Neves, Ana Christina
    Miranda, Milton Edson
    Teixeira, Marcelo Lucchesi
    [J]. BRAZILIAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 25 (02) : 163 - 167
  • [23] Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material
    Sakornwimon, Nawapat
    Leevailoj, Chalermpol
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 118 (03): : 386 - 391
  • [24] Accuracy of Different Impression Techniques for Internal-Connection Implants
    Lee, Yun-Jung
    Heo, Seong-Joo
    Koak, Jai-Young
    Kim, Seong-Kyun
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2009, 24 (05) : 823 - 830
  • [25] Effect of 3 medicaments on the dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of polyvinyl siloxane impressions
    O'Mahony, A
    Spencer, P
    Williams, K
    Corcoran, J
    [J]. QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 31 (03): : 201 - 206
  • [26] The Accuracy of Casts Obtained Using Different Impression Techniques and Impression Materials in Combined Parallel and Angulated Implants: An In Vitro Study
    Menaga, V
    Chirom, Babina
    Gunadhar, Kangjam
    Priyadarshini, Shamurailatpam
    Nongthombam, Rajesh S.
    Manikandan, P.
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [27] Comparison of digital scanning and polyvinyl siloxane impression techniques by dental students: instructional efficiency and attitudes towards technology
    Marti, A. M.
    Harris, B. T.
    Metz, M. J.
    Morton, D.
    Scarfe, W. C.
    Metz, C. J.
    Lin, W-S.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION, 2017, 21 (03) : 200 - 205
  • [28] Comparison of different impression techniques for edentulous jaws using three-dimensional analysis
    Jung, Sua
    Park, Chan
    Yang, Hong-So
    Lim, Hyun-Pil
    Yun, Kwi-Dug
    Ying, Zhai
    Park, Sang-Won
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2019, 11 (03): : 179 - 186
  • [29] Accuracy of different definitive impression techniques with the all-on-4 protocol
    Ozan, Oguz
    Hamis, Oguz
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2019, 121 (06): : 941 - 948
  • [30] Accuracy of Impression Techniques for Dental Implants Placed in Five Different Orientations
    Kim, Hyo-Seon
    Lee, Jae-Hyun
    Lee, Su Young
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2022, 37 (05) : 997 - 1002