Comparing accuracy of cochlear measurements on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography: A step towards radiation-free cochlear implantation

被引:0
|
作者
Anurita Swarup [1 ]
Vinusree Karakkandy [1 ]
Preetam Chappity [1 ]
Suprava Naik [2 ]
Sanjay Kumar Behera [1 ]
Pradipta Kumar Parida [1 ]
Mohnish Grover [3 ]
Gaurav Gupta [4 ]
Prajna Paramita Giri [5 ]
Saurav Sarkar [1 ]
Pradeep Pradhan [1 ]
Dillip Kumar Samal [1 ]
Aswathi Kallyadan Veetil [1 ]
Asutosh Adhikari [1 ]
Saurav Nayak [6 ]
机构
[1] Department of ENT and HNS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
[2] Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
[3] Department of ENT, Sawai Man Singh Medical College
[4] Department of ENT, Sardar Patel Medical College
[5] Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
[6] Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R764.9 [耳部外科手术];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Computed Tomography(CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) are commonly employed in pre-operative evaluation for cochlear implant surgery. However, with a decrease in the age of implantation, even minor radiation exposure can cause detrimental effects on children over their lifetime.The current study compares different cochlear measurements from CT and MRI scans and evaluates the feasibility of using only an MRI scan for radiological evaluation before cochlear implantation.Methods: A longitudinal observational study was conducted on 94 ears/47 children, employing CT and MRI scans. The CT and MRI scan measurements include, A value, B value, Cochlear duct length(CDL), twoturn cochlear length, alpha and beta angles to look for cochlear orientation. Cochlear nerve diameter was measured using MRI. The values were compared.Results: The mean difference between measurements from CT and MRI scans for A value, B value, CDL,and two-turn cochlear length values was 0.567 ± 0.413 mm, 0.406 ± 0.368 mm, 2.365 ± 1.675 mm, and2.063 ± 1.477 mm respectively without any significant difference. The alpha and beta angle measures were comparable, with no statistically significant difference.Conclusion: The study suggests that MRI scans can be the only radiological investigation needed with no radiation risk and reduces the cost of cochlear implant program in the paediatric population. There is no significant difference between the measurements obtained from CT and MRI scans. However, observed discrepancies in cochlear measurements across different populations require regionally or race-specific standardized values to ensure accurate diagnosis and precision in cochlear implant surgery. This aspect must be addressed to ensure positive outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 213
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Quantification of body composition in renal cell carcinoma patients: Comparing computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging measurements
    Higgins, Michelle, I
    Martini, Dylan J.
    Patil, Dattatraya H.
    Steele, Sean
    Evans, Sean
    Petrinec, Benjamin P.
    Psutka, Sarah P.
    Sekhar, Aarti
    Bilen, Mehmet Asim
    Master, Viraj A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2020, 132
  • [32] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computed tomography for the detection of chondral lesions of the knee
    Toby O. Smith
    Benjamin T. Drew
    Andoni P. Toms
    Simon T. Donell
    Caroline B. Hing
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012, 20 : 2367 - 2379
  • [33] Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and computed tomography for the detection of chondral lesions of the knee
    Smith, Toby O.
    Drew, Benjamin T.
    Toms, Andoni P.
    Donell, Simon T.
    Hing, Caroline B.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2012, 20 (12) : 2367 - 2379
  • [34] Accuracy of Osteophyte Detection in Conventional Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Joints
    Al-Attar, N.
    Venne, G.
    Easteal, R.
    Kunz, M.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2015, 29
  • [35] Trauma After Cochlear Implantation: The Accuracy of Micro-Computed Tomography and Cone-Beam Fusion Computed Tomography Compared With Histology in Human Temporal Bones
    Iso-Mustajaervi, Matti
    Silvast, Tuomo
    Heikka, Tuomas
    Tervaniemi, Jyrki
    Calixto, Roger
    Linder, Pia H.
    Dietz, Aarno
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2023, 44 (04) : 339 - 345
  • [36] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Patients With Sensorineural Hearing Loss Caused by Meningitis: Implications for Cochlear Implantation
    van Loon, Maarten C.
    Hensen, Erik F.
    de Foer, Bert
    Smit, Conrad F.
    Witte, Birgit
    Merkus, Paul
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2013, 34 (05) : 845 - 854
  • [37] The application of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging rendering of the inner ear in assessment for cochlear implantation
    Murugasu, E
    Hans, P
    Jackson, A
    Ramsden, RT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1999, 20 (06): : 752 - 757
  • [38] Prediction of the Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in the Patients with Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Characteristics
    Han, Jae Joon
    Bae, Yun Jung
    Song, Seul Ki
    Song, Jae-Jin
    Koo, Ja-Won
    Lee, Jun Ho
    Oh, Seung Ha
    Kim, Bong Jik
    Choi, Byung Yoon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (02)
  • [39] Functional magnetic resonance imaging of hearing-impaired children under sedation before cochlear implantation
    Patel, Ankur M.
    Cahill, Lisa D.
    Ret, Jennifer
    Schmithorst, Vincent
    Choo, Daniel
    Holland, Scott
    ARCHIVES OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2007, 133 (07) : 677 - 683
  • [40] Stereotactic Imaging for radiosurgery: Localization accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography compared with computed tomography
    Mori, Yoshimasa
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Iwase, Mikio
    Yamada, Masami
    Takikawa, Yukinori
    Uchiyama, Yukio
    Oda, Kyota
    Kaii, Osamu
    STEREOTACTIC AND FUNCTIONAL NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 84 (04) : 142 - 146