Comparing accuracy of cochlear measurements on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography: A step towards radiation-free cochlear implantation

被引:0
|
作者
Anurita Swarup [1 ]
Vinusree Karakkandy [1 ]
Preetam Chappity [1 ]
Suprava Naik [2 ]
Sanjay Kumar Behera [1 ]
Pradipta Kumar Parida [1 ]
Mohnish Grover [3 ]
Gaurav Gupta [4 ]
Prajna Paramita Giri [5 ]
Saurav Sarkar [1 ]
Pradeep Pradhan [1 ]
Dillip Kumar Samal [1 ]
Aswathi Kallyadan Veetil [1 ]
Asutosh Adhikari [1 ]
Saurav Nayak [6 ]
机构
[1] Department of ENT and HNS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
[2] Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
[3] Department of ENT, Sawai Man Singh Medical College
[4] Department of ENT, Sardar Patel Medical College
[5] Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
[6] Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS)
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R764.9 [耳部外科手术];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: Computed Tomography(CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) are commonly employed in pre-operative evaluation for cochlear implant surgery. However, with a decrease in the age of implantation, even minor radiation exposure can cause detrimental effects on children over their lifetime.The current study compares different cochlear measurements from CT and MRI scans and evaluates the feasibility of using only an MRI scan for radiological evaluation before cochlear implantation.Methods: A longitudinal observational study was conducted on 94 ears/47 children, employing CT and MRI scans. The CT and MRI scan measurements include, A value, B value, Cochlear duct length(CDL), twoturn cochlear length, alpha and beta angles to look for cochlear orientation. Cochlear nerve diameter was measured using MRI. The values were compared.Results: The mean difference between measurements from CT and MRI scans for A value, B value, CDL,and two-turn cochlear length values was 0.567 ± 0.413 mm, 0.406 ± 0.368 mm, 2.365 ± 1.675 mm, and2.063 ± 1.477 mm respectively without any significant difference. The alpha and beta angle measures were comparable, with no statistically significant difference.Conclusion: The study suggests that MRI scans can be the only radiological investigation needed with no radiation risk and reduces the cost of cochlear implant program in the paediatric population. There is no significant difference between the measurements obtained from CT and MRI scans. However, observed discrepancies in cochlear measurements across different populations require regionally or race-specific standardized values to ensure accurate diagnosis and precision in cochlear implant surgery. This aspect must be addressed to ensure positive outcomes for patients.
引用
收藏
页码:208 / 213
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing accuracy of cochlear measurements on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography: A step towards radiation-free cochlear implantation
    Swarup, Anurita
    Karakkandy, Vinusree
    Chappity, Preetam
    Naik, Suprava
    Behera, Sanjay Kumar
    Parida, Pradipta Kumar
    Grover, Mohnish
    Gupta, Gaurav
    Giri, Prajna Paramita
    Sarkar, Saurav
    Pradhan, Pradeep
    Samal, Dillip Kumar
    Veetil, Aswathi Kallyadan
    Adhikari, Asutosh
    Nayak, Saurav
    JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 2023, 18 (04) : 208 - 213
  • [2] Computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging before pediatric cochlear implantation? Developing an investigative strategy
    Trimble, Keith
    Blaser, Susan
    James, Adrian L.
    Papsin, Blake C.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2007, 28 (03) : 317 - 324
  • [3] COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY AND MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING IN THE PREOPERATIVE WORK-UP FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION
    KLEIN, HM
    BOHNDORF, K
    HERMES, H
    SCHUTZ, WF
    GUNTHER, RW
    SCHLONDORFF, G
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1992, 15 (01) : 89 - 92
  • [4] Accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography in cochlear implantation
    Langman, AW
    Quigley, SM
    OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1996, 114 (01) : 38 - 43
  • [5] Cochlear Duct Length Measurements in Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Newly Developed Techniques
    Taeger, Johannes
    Mueller-Graff, Franz Tassilo
    Ilgen, Lukas
    Schendzielorz, Phillip
    Hagen, Rudolf
    Neun, Tilman
    Rak, Kristen
    OTO OPEN, 2021, 5 (03)
  • [6] The role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative pediatric cochlear implantation work-up in academic institutions
    Ambrosio, Art A.
    Loundon, Natalie
    Vinocur, Daniel
    Kruk, Peter
    Le Pointe, Hubert Ducou
    Chalard, Francois
    Zapala, Matthew
    Carvalho, Daniela
    COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 22 (02) : 96 - 102
  • [7] Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 T After Cochlear Implantation
    Crane, Benjamin T.
    Gottschalk, Barbara
    Kraut, Michael
    Aygun, Nafi
    Niparko, John K.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (08) : 1215 - 1220
  • [8] The Prevalence of Cochlear Obliteration After Labyrinthectomy Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Implications for Cochlear Implantation
    Charlett, Simon D.
    Biggs, Nigel
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (08) : 1328 - 1330
  • [9] Utility of Preoperative Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Candidates
    Tamplen, Matthew
    Schwalje, Adam
    Lustig, Lawrence
    Alemi, Aurash S.
    Miller, Mia E.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2016, 126 (06): : 1440 - 1445
  • [10] Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Accurate, Radiation-Free, Alternative to Computed Tomography for the Primary Imaging and Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of the Bony Orbit
    Schmutz, Beat
    Rahmel, Benjamin
    McNamara, Zeb
    Coulthard, Alan
    Schuetz, Michael
    Lynham, Anthony
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2014, 72 (03) : 611 - 618