Does the environmental protection tax reduce environmental pollution? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

被引:0
|
作者
Qiuyue Yin
Yongsheng Lin
Bo Yuan
Zhanfeng Dong
机构
[1] Beijing Normal University,School of Economics and Resource Management
[2] Beijing Normal University,China Market Economy Research Center
[3] Nankai University,School of Economics
[4] Chinese Academy of Environmental Planning,The Center for Environmental Tax
关键词
Environmental protection tax; Environmental pollution; DID model; China;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The environmental protection tax (EPT) is an important environmental policy in China. However, it remains unclear whether the EPT has reduced environmental pollution effectively since its implementation in 2018. Based on the panel data of 229 prefecture-level cities in China during 2015–2019 and the difference-in-differences (DID) model, this study empirically assesses the causal effect of the EPT on environmental pollution. It is found that the EPT has a significantly negative effect on industrial sulfur dioxide (SO2) and industrial soot (dust) emissions but has no significant impact on industrial wastewater emissions. The mechanism analysis reveals that the EPT has the tax enforcement effect and energy efficiency effect, that is, the EPT reduces pollution emissions through increasing actual tax burden and improving the efficiency of energy utilization. However, the innovation effect is weak, which is only effective in reducing industrial SO2 emissions. Finally, we compare how different types of cities responded to the EPT. The results show that the EPT has limited effect on environmental pollution in large cities and southern China.
引用
收藏
页码:106198 / 106213
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Environmental regulation and stock price synchronicity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Chen, Jing
    Liu, Xinghe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2023, 88 : 1513 - 1528
  • [32] Automatic air pollution monitoring and corporate environmental disclosure: a quasi-natural experiment from China
    Chen, Hanwen
    Liu, Siyi
    Yang, Daoguang
    Zhang, Di
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2023, 14 (03) : 538 - 564
  • [33] Can intellectual property rights protection reduce air pollution? A quasi-natural experiment from China
    Lv, Kangjuan
    Pan, Minjie
    Huang, Li
    Song, Daqiang
    Qian, Xinlei
    [J]. STRUCTURAL CHANGE AND ECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2023, 65 : 210 - 222
  • [34] Does Public Participation Reduce Regional Carbon Emissions? A Quasi-Natural Experiment from Environmental Information Disclosure in China
    Yang, Yongliang
    Zhang, Xin
    Wu, Tingli
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES, 2023, 32 (02): : 1899 - 1917
  • [35] Official environmental accountability policy and firm's environmental violations: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Wei, Huafei
    Du, Lei
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (08) : 20397 - 20412
  • [36] Environmental regulation and firms' performance: a quasi-natural experiment from China
    Li, Juan
    Zhao, Min
    Yang, Yien
    [J]. CHINESE JOURNAL OF POPULATION RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 17 (03) : 278 - 294
  • [37] Does urban civilization improve corporate environmental performance? A quasi-natural experiment from China
    Dong, Yuting
    Sun, Ziyuan
    Gu, Xiao
    Wang, Wenjiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2024,
  • [38] Does implementation of a environmental protection tax reduce energy consumption: evidence from China
    Li, Xing
    Xu, Shulin
    Xiong, Yunjun
    [J]. ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [39] Do banks price environmental transition risks? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Huang, Bihong
    Punzi, Maria Teresa
    Wu, Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2021, 69
  • [40] The power of anti-corruption in environmental innovation: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Zhou, Kuo
    Luo, Haotian
    Ye, Diyu
    Tao, Yunqing
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2022, 182