A 13-hour laboratory school study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in school-aged children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

被引:18
|
作者
Wigal S.B. [1 ]
Kollins S.H. [2 ]
Childress A.C. [3 ]
Squires L. [4 ]
Brams M.
Childress A. [3 ]
Lerner M.A.
Moon E.
Turnbow J.M.
Vince B.
机构
[1] University of California, Irvine, Child Development Center, Irvine, CA
[2] Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
[3] Center for Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Las Vegas, NV
[4] Shire Development Inc, Wayne, PA
关键词
Lisdexamfetamine; Primary Efficacy Measure; Clinical Global Impression; Laboratory School; Crossover Phase;
D O I
10.1186/1753-2000-3-17
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is indicated for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children 6 to 12 years of age and in adults. In a previous laboratory school study, LDX demonstrated efficacy 2 hours postdose with duration of efficacy through 12 hours. The current study further characterizes the time course of effect of LDX. Methods: Children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD were enrolled in a laboratory school study. The multicenter study consisted of open-label, dose-optimization of LDX (30, 50, 70 mg/d, 4 weeks) followed by a randomized, placebo-controlled, 2-way crossover phase (1 week each). Efficacy measures included the SKAMP (deportment [primary] and attention [secondary]) and PERMP (attempted/correct) scales (secondary) measured at predose and at 1.5, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12, and 13 hours postdose. Safety measures included treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), physical examination, vital signs, and ECGs. Results: A total of 117 subjects were randomized and 111 completed the study. Compared with placebo, LDX demonstrated significantly greater efficacy at each postdose time point (1.5 hours to 13.0 hours), as measured by SKAMP deportment and attention scales and PERMP (P < .005). The most common treatment-emergent AEs during dose optimization were decreased appetite (47%), insomnia (27%), headache (17%), irritability (16%), upper abdominal pain (16%), and affect lability (10%), which were less frequent in the crossover phase (6%, 4%, 5%, 1%, 2%, and 0% respectively). Conclusion: In school-aged children (6 to 12 years) with ADHD, efficacy of LDX was maintained from the first time point (1.5 hours) up to the last time point assessed (13.0 hours). LDX was generally well tolerated, resulting in typical stimulant AEs. © 2009 Wigal et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patterns of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate Use in Children, Adolescents, and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Europe
    Siffel, Csaba
    Page, Matthew
    Maxwell, Tricia
    Thun, Barbara
    Kolb, Nikolaus
    Rosenlund, Mats
    von Bredow, Dorothea
    Keja, Jacco
    JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 30 (07) : 439 - 447
  • [42] Clinical Response and Symptomatic Remission in Children Treated With Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    Findling, Robert L.
    Adeyi, Ben
    Chen, Gary
    Dirks, Bryan
    Babcock, Thomas
    Scheckner, Brian
    Lasser, Robert
    Pucci, Michael L.
    Abdullah, Huda I.
    McGough, James J.
    CNS SPECTRUMS, 2010, 15 (09) : 559 - 568
  • [43] Motor assessment in school-aged children with indicators of the attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Poeta, L. S.
    Rosa-Neto, F.
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2007, 44 (03) : 146 - 149
  • [44] Efficacy and Safety of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Recent Methylphenidate Use
    Jain, Rakesh
    Babcock, Thomas
    Burtea, Teodor
    Dirks, Bryan
    Adeyi, Ben
    Scheckner, Brian
    Lasser, Robert
    Renna, John
    Duncan, Don
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2013, 30 (05) : 472 - 486
  • [45] Association between dietary behaviors and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disabilities in school-aged children
    Park, Subin
    Cho, Soo-Churl
    Hong, Yun-Chul
    Oh, Se-Young
    Kim, Jae-Won
    Shin, Min-Sup
    Kim, Boong-Nyun
    Yoo, Hee-Jeong
    Cho, In-Hee
    Bhang, Soo-Young
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2012, 198 (03) : 468 - 476
  • [46] Visuospatial and Verbal Working Memory Impairments in School-Aged Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
    Simone, A.
    Bedard, A.
    O'Neill, S.
    Rajendran, K.
    Halperin, J.
    ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 28 (06) : 614 - 615
  • [47] Quality of life among Indonesian school-aged children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A concept analysis
    Saputra, Fauzan
    Sutrisna, Eka
    Ardilla, Arista
    Fauziah
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2024, 15 (03): : 348 - 356
  • [48] Clinical practice guideline: Treatment of the school-aged child with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
    Perrin, JM
    Stein, MT
    Amler, RW
    Blondis, TA
    Feldman, HM
    Meyer, BP
    Shaywitz, BA
    Wolraich, ML
    DeSpirito, A
    Homer, CJ
    Wender, E
    Brown, RT
    Ganiats, TG
    Grabert, B
    Pierce, K
    Herrerias, CT
    Homer, CJ
    Baltz, RD
    Hickson, GB
    Miles, PV
    Newman, TB
    Shook, JE
    Zurhellen, WM
    Lowe, BA
    Schwalenstocker, E
    Goldberg, MJ
    Shiffman, R
    Berger, JE
    France, FL
    PEDIATRICS, 2001, 108 (04) : 1033 - 1044
  • [49] Improvements in symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in school-aged children with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate [LDX; NRP104] and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release vs. placebo
    Biederman, Joseph
    Boellner, Samuel W.
    Childress, Ann
    Lopez, Frank A.
    Krishnan, Suma
    Mandler, Hilary
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENTAL AND BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS, 2006, 27 (05): : 442 - 442
  • [50] Sex Subgroup Analysis of Treatment Response to Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Children Aged 6 to 12 Years With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
    McGough, James J.
    Greenbaum, Michael
    Adeyi, Ben
    Babcock, Thomas
    Scheckner, Brian
    Dirks, Bryan
    Findling, Robert L.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2012, 32 (01) : 138 - 140