Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of geopolymer cement manufacturing with Portland cement in Indian context

被引:0
|
作者
R. B. Meshram
S. Kumar
机构
[1] Metal Extraction and Recycling Division,CSIR
关键词
Geopolymer cement; Life cycle assessment; Portland cement; Industrial waste;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
India is the second-leading cement producer in the world after China. Cement causes huge carbon footprint during the production and transportation of materials. Various efforts are being made to reduce the environmental impacts. Among the notable developments are the use of by-product or secondary material to develop new binders such as geopolymer cement. This paper contains a cradle-to-gate life cycle impact assessment of two types of geopolymer cement produced from blending fly ash and slag, and blending fly ash and cement in an Indian scenario. As there is no standard data available for geopolymer cement production, the primary data used were collected by producing geopolymer cement at pilot scale (5 t/d). In an Indian context, the geopolymer cement significantly reduces the global warming potential (267 kg CO2-Equiv.), abiotic depletion potential fossil (3092 MJ), abiotic depletion potential element (1.18 e−3 kg Sb-Equiv.), human toxicity potential (249 kg DCB-Equiv.), and terrestrial ecotoxicity potential (0.438 kg DCB-Equiv.) with blending fly ash and slag. The geopolymer cement produced from fly ash and slag reduces the global warming potential by 70%, abiotic depletion potential fossil by 49%, abiotic depletion potential element by 34%, and terrestrial ecotoxicity potential by 77% when compared with ordinary Portland cement of the building and construction industries. In case of geopolymer cement, the maximum impact on the environment is due to the use of an alkali solution. Based on the analysis, geopolymer cement appears more sustainable than traditional cement and thus has good potential as an alternate binder.
引用
收藏
页码:4791 / 4802
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Life cycle assessment (LCA) of portland composite cement (PCC) 50 kg papercraft bag at PT. Semen Padang
    Panggabean, T.
    Aziz, R.
    Dewilda, Y.
    2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY ISSUES, AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 623
  • [12] Life cycle assessment of the production of Portland cement: a Southern Europe case study
    Stafford, Fernanda N.
    Dias, Ana C.
    Arroja, Luis
    Labrincha, Joao A.
    Hotza, Dachamir
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 126 : 159 - 165
  • [13] An Evaluation of Life Long Fly Ash based Geopolymer Cement and Ordinary Portland Cement Costs Using Extended Life Cycle Cost Method in Australia
    Chan, C. C. S.
    Thorpe, D.
    Islam, M.
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2015, : 52 - 56
  • [14] Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impacts between Dregs Disposal and Conventional Cement Production by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)
    Fu, Kan
    Ren, Xiaoyu
    Lin, Jinquan
    Yue, Ping
    ENVIRONMENTAL BIOTECHNOLOGY AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING (2013), 2013, 777 : 461 - 466
  • [15] Strength Assessment in Portland Cement and Geopolymer Composites with Abrams' Law as Basis
    Radhakrishna
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED CONCRETE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 18 (06) : 320 - 327
  • [16] A comparative life cycle assessment for sustainable cement production in Turkey
    Cankaya, Simge
    Pekey, Beyhan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 249
  • [17] Geopolymer and Portland cement concretes in simulated fire
    Zhao, R.
    Sanjayan, J. G.
    MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2011, 63 (03) : 163 - 173
  • [18] Geopolymer binder: A veritable alternative to Portland cement
    Okoye, F. N.
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2017, 4 (04) : 5599 - 5604
  • [19] Is magnesia cement low carbon? Life cycle carbon footprint comparing with Portland cement
    Shen, Weiguo
    Cao, Liu
    Li, Qiu
    Wen, Zhaijun
    Wang, Jing
    Liu, Yun
    Dong, Rui
    Tan, Yu
    Chen, Rufa
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 131 : 20 - 27
  • [20] Shear strength and life cycle assessment of volcanic ash-based geopolymer and cement stabilized soil: A comparative study
    Ghadir, Pooria
    Zamanian, Mostafa
    Mahbubi-Motlagh, Nazanin
    Saberian, Mohammad
    Li, Jie
    Ranjbar, Navid
    TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS, 2021, 31