Comparative Analysis of Environmental Impacts between Dregs Disposal and Conventional Cement Production by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

被引:1
|
作者
Fu, Kan [1 ]
Ren, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Lin, Jinquan [1 ]
Yue, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Hainan Prov Res Acad Environm Sci, Haikou, Peoples R China
关键词
life cycle assessment; dregs; disposal; environmental impact;
D O I
10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.777.461
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The environmental impacts of the dregs disposal in cement kiln and conventional production were contrastively evaluated by life cycle assessment (LCA) in this study. The results showed that the environmental load ratio of both cement productions followed the order of energy depletion potential (EDP) > depletion potential (ADP) > global warming potential (GWP) > acidification potential (AP) > human toxicity (HT) > photochemical ozone creation potential (POCP). The comprehensive environmental load of disposal dregs was 14.465 x 10(-12)/a, which was 3.98% lower than that of the conventional cement production. Moreover, the reduced percentage of the environmental load followed the order of HT > AP > POCP > EDP > ADP > GWP, which indicated that the reduced percentage of human toxicity and acidification reached 10.62% and 10.06% respectively. Thus, considering the environmental benefits, it would be a better method to dispose dregs instead of limestone in cement kiln.
引用
收藏
页码:461 / 466
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS OF FRUIT PRODUCTION USING LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (LCA)
    Butcaru, Ana Cornelia
    Catuneanu, Ioana Laura
    Stanica, Florin
    Badulescu, Liliana
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS-SERIES B-HORTICULTURE, 2021, 65 (02): : 11 - 18
  • [2] Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of PET bottles and comparative LCA of three disposal options in Mauritius
    Faculty of Engineering, University of Mauritius, Mauritius
    [J]. Int. J. Environ. Waste Manage, 2008, 1-2 (125-138):
  • [3] A review of the effectiveness of Life Cycle Assessment for gauging environmental impacts from cement production
    Ige, Oluwafemi E.
    Olanrewaju, Oludolapo A.
    Duffy, Kevin J.
    Obiora, Collins
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 324
  • [4] Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of geopolymer cement manufacturing with Portland cement in Indian context
    Meshram, R. B.
    Kumar, S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 19 (06) : 4791 - 4802
  • [5] Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of geopolymer cement manufacturing with Portland cement in Indian context
    R. B. Meshram
    S. Kumar
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2022, 19 : 4791 - 4802
  • [6] Environmental impacts of dry anaerobic biorefineries in a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach
    Rossi, Elena
    Pasciucco, Francesco
    Iannelli, Renato
    Pecorini, Isabella
    [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 371
  • [7] Environmental impacts of dry anaerobic biorefineries in a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach
    Rossi, Elena
    Pasciucco, Francesco
    Iannelli, Renato
    Pecorini, Isabella
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 371
  • [8] Carbon reduction in cement industry - An indigenized questionnaire on environmental impacts and key parameters of life cycle assessment (LCA) in China
    Guo, Xiaolu
    Li, Yinxue
    Shi, Huisheng
    She, Anming
    Guo, Yuchen
    Su, Qiang
    Ren, Bingjian
    Liu, Zhuolin
    Tao, Congxi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 426
  • [9] Environmental impacts, life cycle assessment and potential improvement measures for cement production: a literature review
    Andres Salas, Daniel
    Diego Ramirez, Angel
    Raul Rodriguez, Carlos
    Marx Petroche, Daniel
    Jael Boero, Andrea
    Duque-Rivera, Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 113 : 114 - 122
  • [10] Environmental impacts of energy use in wheat tillage systems: A comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) study in Iran
    Houshyar, Ehsan
    Grundmann, Philipp
    [J]. ENERGY, 2017, 122 : 11 - 24