Disparities in spatially variable gene calling highlight the need for benchmarking spatial transcriptomics methods

被引:0
|
作者
Natalie Charitakis
Agus Salim
Adam T. Piers
Kevin I. Watt
Enzo R. Porrello
David A. Elliott
Mirana Ramialison
机构
[1] Murdoch Children’s Research Institute,Department of Paediatrics
[2] Royal Children’s Hospital,Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Stem Cell Medicine
[3] University of Melbourne,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health
[4] Murdoch Children’s Research Institute,School of Mathematics and Statistics
[5] Royal Children’s Hospital,Melbourne Centre for Cardiovascular Genomics and Regenerative Medicine
[6] University of Melbourne,Department of Anatomy and Physiology
[7] University of Melbourne,Department of Diabetes
[8] The Royal Children’s Hospital,undefined
[9] University of Melbourne,undefined
[10] Monash University,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Identifying spatially variable genes (SVGs) is a key step in the analysis of spatially resolved transcriptomics data. SVGs provide biological insights by defining transcriptomic differences within tissues, which was previously unachievable using RNA-sequencing technologies. However, the increasing number of published tools designed to define SVG sets currently lack benchmarking methods to accurately assess performance. This study compares results of 6 purpose-built packages for SVG identification across 9 public and 5 simulated datasets and highlights discrepancies between results. Additional tools for generation of simulated data and development of benchmarking methods are required to improve methods for identifying SVGs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [21] Benchmarking spatial and single-cell transcriptomics integration methods for transcript distribution prediction and cell type deconvolution
    Bin Li
    Wen Zhang
    Chuang Guo
    Hao Xu
    Longfei Li
    Minghao Fang
    Yinlei Hu
    Xinye Zhang
    Xinfeng Yao
    Meifang Tang
    Ke Liu
    Xuetong Zhao
    Jun Lin
    Linzhao Cheng
    Falai Chen
    Tian Xue
    Kun Qu
    Nature Methods, 2022, 19 : 662 - 670
  • [22] Benchmarking spatial and single-cell transcriptomics integration methods for transcript distribution prediction and cell type deconvolution
    Li, Bin
    Zhang, Wen
    Guo, Chuang
    Xu, Hao
    Li, Longfei
    Fang, Minghao
    Hu, Yinlei
    Zhang, Xinye
    Yao, Xinfeng
    Tang, Meifang
    Liu, Ke
    Zhao, Xuetong
    Lin, Jun
    Cheng, Linzhao
    Chen, Falai
    Xue, Tian
    Qu, Kun
    NATURE METHODS, 2022, 19 (06) : 662 - +
  • [23] DESpace: spatially variable gene detection via differential expression testing of spatial clusters
    Cai, Peiying
    Robinson, Mark D.
    Tiberi, Simone
    BIOINFORMATICS, 2024, 40 (02)
  • [24] SpaGCN: Integrating gene expression, spatial location and histology to identify spatial domains and spatially variable genes by graph convolutional network
    Hu, Jian
    Li, Xiangjie
    Coleman, Kyle
    Schroeder, Amelia
    Ma, Nan
    Irwin, David J.
    Lee, Edward B.
    Shinohara, Russell T.
    Li, Mingyao
    NATURE METHODS, 2021, 18 (11) : 1342 - +
  • [25] SpaGCN: Integrating gene expression, spatial location and histology to identify spatial domains and spatially variable genes by graph convolutional network
    Jian Hu
    Xiangjie Li
    Kyle Coleman
    Amelia Schroeder
    Nan Ma
    David J. Irwin
    Edward B. Lee
    Russell T. Shinohara
    Mingyao Li
    Nature Methods, 2021, 18 : 1342 - 1351
  • [26] Cell-type modeling in spatial transcriptomics data elucidates spatially variable colocalization and communication between cell-types in mouse brain
    Canozo, Francisco Jose Grisanti
    Zuo, Zhen
    Martin, James F.
    Samee, Md Abul Hassan
    CELL SYSTEMS, 2022, 13 (01) : 58 - 70.e5