Prediction of protein–protein interactions between anti-CRISPR and CRISPR-Cas using machine learning technique

被引:0
|
作者
Sneha Murmu
Himanshushekhar Chaurasia
Sayanti Guha Majumdar
A. R. Rao
Anil Rai
Sunil Archak
机构
[1] ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute,Division of Agricultural Bioinformatics
[2] ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute,undefined
[3] ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology,undefined
[4] Indian Council of Agricultural Research,undefined
[5] ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources,undefined
关键词
Anti-CRISPR protein; CRSIPR-associated protein; Acr; Cas; Protein–protein interactions; Machine learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
CRISPR-Cas system, responsible for bacterial adaptive immune response, has evolved as the game-changer in the field of genome editing and has revolutionized both animal and plant research owing to its efficiency and feasibility. CRSIPR- associated (Cas) protein, an integral component of the CRSIPR-Cas toolkit, cut the target genetic material for making the desirable edits. However, unchecked nuclease activity of Cas protein may lead to unforeseen off-target effects. Anti-CRISPR (Acr), small proteins usually found in phages and other mobile genetic elements, are the natural inhibitors of the Cas proteins that help phages to escape the immune system of the host. Acr proteins regulate the activity of the Cas nuclease by interacting with its different domains which results in the blockage of CRISPR activity. Thus, it is essential to understand the interactions between these two rival proteins in order to switch off the cutting machinery when needed. Experimental methods to identify protein–protein interaction, are often costly, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. Computational strategies, such as data- driven predictive models, can complement experimental studies by providing fast, efficient, reliable, and cheaper alternatives to predict protein interactions. Herein, we report the first machine learning-based predictive model to identify novel interactions between Acr and Cas proteins using an ensemble strategy. The accuracy of our proposed ensemble model was more than 95%, indicating its high predictive power. The developed model can contribute to automate the process of discovering the natural inhibitors of Cas protein for controlling the off- target cleavage and improving the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas technology. To extend the support for diverse levels of end-users, a web application named AcrCasPPI was developed which is available at http://login1.cabgrid.res.in:5020/. Alternatively, a python package named acrcasppi-ml, is also available at https://pypi.org/project/acrcasppi-ml/.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 830
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Use of anti-CRISPR protein AcrIIA4 as a capture ligand for CRISPR/Cas9 detection
    Johnston, Robert K.
    Seamon, Kyle J.
    Saada, Edwin A.
    Podlevsky, Joshua D.
    Branda, Steven S.
    Timlin, Jerilyn A.
    Harper, Jason C.
    BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS, 2019, 141
  • [42] 肺炎克雷伯菌CRISPR-Cas系统及anti-CRISPR蛋白家族研究进展
    姜春宇
    郭晓奎
    秦金红
    上海交通大学学报(医学版), 2022, 42 (12) : 1757 - 1765
  • [43] Machine learning predicts new anti-CRISPR proteins
    Eitzinger, Simon
    Asif, Amina
    Watters, Kyle E.
    Iavarone, Anthony T.
    Knott, Gavin J.
    Doudna, Jennifer A.
    Minhas, Fayyaz ul Amir Afsar
    NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2020, 48 (09) : 4698 - 4708
  • [44] Anti-CRISPR prediction using deep learning reveals an inhibitor of Cas13b nucleases
    Wandera, Katharina G.
    Alkhnbashi, Omer S.
    Bassett, Harris V. I.
    Mitrofanov, Alexander
    Hauns, Sven
    Migur, Anzhela
    Backofen, Rolf
    Beisel, Chase L.
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2022, 82 (14) : 2714 - +
  • [45] A phage-encoded anti-CRISPR enables complete evasion of type VI-A CRISPR-Cas immunity
    Meeske, Alexander J.
    Jia, Ning
    Cassel, Alice K.
    Kozlova, Albina
    Liao, Jingqiu
    Wiedmann, Martin
    Patel, Dinshaw J.
    Marraffini, Luciano A.
    SCIENCE, 2020, 369 (6499) : 54 - +
  • [46] Anti-CRISPR protein AcrIF4 inhibits the type I-F CRISPR-Cas surveillance complex by blocking nuclease recruitment and DNA cleavage
    Gao, Zhengyu
    Zhang, Laixing
    Ge, Zihao
    Wang, Hao
    Yue, Yourun
    Jiang, Zhuobing
    Wang, Xin
    Xu, Chenying
    Zhang, Yi
    Yang, Maojun
    Feng, Yue
    JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 298 (11)
  • [47] Meet the Anti-CRISPRs: Widespread Protein Inhibitors of CRISPR-Cas Systems
    Hwana, Sungwon
    Maxwell, Karen L.
    CRISPR JOURNAL, 2019, 2 (01): : 23 - 30
  • [48] Structural basis of CRISPR-SpyCas9 inhibition by an anti-CRISPR protein
    Dong, De
    Guo, Minghui
    Wang, Sihan
    Zhu, Yuwei
    Wang, Shuo
    Xiong, Zhi
    Yang, Jianzheng
    Xu, Zengliang
    Huang, Zhiwei
    NATURE, 2017, 546 (7658) : 436 - +
  • [49] Structural basis of CRISPR–SpyCas9 inhibition by an anti-CRISPR protein
    De Dong
    Minghui Guo
    Sihan Wang
    Yuwei Zhu
    Shuo Wang
    Zhi Xiong
    Jianzheng Yang
    Zengliang Xu
    Zhiwei Huang
    Nature, 2017, 546 : 436 - 439
  • [50] Cas9 Allosteric Inhibition by the Anti-CRISPR Protein AcrIIA6
    Fuchsbauer, Olivier
    Swuec, Paolo
    Zimberger, Claire
    Amigues, Beatrice
    Levesque, Sebastien
    Agudelo, Daniel
    Duringer, Alexis
    Chaves-Sanjuan, Antonio
    Spinelli, Silvia
    Rousseau, Genevieve M.
    Velimirovic, Minja
    Bolognesi, Martino
    Roussel, Alain
    Cambillau, Christian
    Moineau, Sylvain
    Doyon, Yannick
    Goulet, Adeline
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2019, 76 (06) : 922 - +