Prediction of protein–protein interactions between anti-CRISPR and CRISPR-Cas using machine learning technique

被引:0
|
作者
Sneha Murmu
Himanshushekhar Chaurasia
Sayanti Guha Majumdar
A. R. Rao
Anil Rai
Sunil Archak
机构
[1] ICAR-Indian Agricultural Statistics Research Institute,Division of Agricultural Bioinformatics
[2] ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute,undefined
[3] ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology,undefined
[4] Indian Council of Agricultural Research,undefined
[5] ICAR-National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources,undefined
关键词
Anti-CRISPR protein; CRSIPR-associated protein; Acr; Cas; Protein–protein interactions; Machine learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
CRISPR-Cas system, responsible for bacterial adaptive immune response, has evolved as the game-changer in the field of genome editing and has revolutionized both animal and plant research owing to its efficiency and feasibility. CRSIPR- associated (Cas) protein, an integral component of the CRSIPR-Cas toolkit, cut the target genetic material for making the desirable edits. However, unchecked nuclease activity of Cas protein may lead to unforeseen off-target effects. Anti-CRISPR (Acr), small proteins usually found in phages and other mobile genetic elements, are the natural inhibitors of the Cas proteins that help phages to escape the immune system of the host. Acr proteins regulate the activity of the Cas nuclease by interacting with its different domains which results in the blockage of CRISPR activity. Thus, it is essential to understand the interactions between these two rival proteins in order to switch off the cutting machinery when needed. Experimental methods to identify protein–protein interaction, are often costly, time-consuming, and labor-intensive. Computational strategies, such as data- driven predictive models, can complement experimental studies by providing fast, efficient, reliable, and cheaper alternatives to predict protein interactions. Herein, we report the first machine learning-based predictive model to identify novel interactions between Acr and Cas proteins using an ensemble strategy. The accuracy of our proposed ensemble model was more than 95%, indicating its high predictive power. The developed model can contribute to automate the process of discovering the natural inhibitors of Cas protein for controlling the off- target cleavage and improving the efficiency of CRISPR-Cas technology. To extend the support for diverse levels of end-users, a web application named AcrCasPPI was developed which is available at http://login1.cabgrid.res.in:5020/. Alternatively, a python package named acrcasppi-ml, is also available at https://pypi.org/project/acrcasppi-ml/.
引用
收藏
页码:818 / 830
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Molecular basis for inhibition of type III-B CRISPR-Cas by an archaeal viral anti-CRISPR protein
    Lin, Jinzhong
    Alfastsen, Lauge
    Bhoobalan-Chitty, Yuvaraj
    Peng, Xu
    CELL HOST & MICROBE, 2023, 31 (11) : 1837 - +
  • [12] Disabling a Type I-E CRISPR-Cas Nuclease with a Bacteriophage-Encoded Anti-CRISPR Protein
    Pawluk, April
    Shah, Megha
    Mejdani, Marios
    Calmettes, Charles
    Moraes, Trevor F.
    Davidson, Alan R.
    Maxwell, Karen L.
    MBIO, 2017, 8 (06):
  • [13] Structural insights into the inactivation of CRISPR-Cas systems by diverse anti-CRISPR proteins
    Yuwei Zhu
    Fan Zhang
    Zhiwei Huang
    BMC Biology, 16
  • [14] Inactivation of CRISPR-Cas systems by anti-CRISPR proteins in diverse bacterial species
    Pawluk, April
    Staals, Raymond H. J.
    Taylor, Corinda
    Watson, Bridget N. J.
    Saha, Senjuti
    Fineran, Peter C.
    Maxwell, Karen L.
    Davidson, Alan R.
    NATURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2016, 1 (08)
  • [15] Gene Digital Circuits Based on CRISPR-Cas Systems and Anti-CRISPR Proteins
    Yu, Lifang
    Zhang, Yadan
    Marchisio, Mario Andrea
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2022, (188):
  • [16] Inactivation of CRISPR-Cas systems by anti-CRISPR proteins in diverse bacterial species
    Pawluk A.
    Staals R.H.J.
    Taylor C.
    Watson B.N.J.
    Saha S.
    Fineran P.C.
    Maxwell K.L.
    Davidson A.R.
    Nature Microbiology, 1 (8)
  • [17] Engineering Anti-CRISPR Proteins to Create CRISPR-Cas Protein Switches for Activatable Genome Editing and Viral Protease Detection
    Kang, Wenyuan
    Xiao, Fei
    Zhu, Xi
    Ling, Xinyu
    Xie, Shiyi
    Li, Ruimiao
    Yu, Peihang
    Cao, Linxin
    Lei, Chunyang
    Qiu, Ye
    Liu, Tao
    Nie, Zhou
    ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION, 2024, 63 (16)
  • [18] Structural basis for inhibition of an archaeal CRISPR-Cas type I-D large subunit by an anti-CRISPR protein
    Manav, M. Cemre
    Van, Lan B.
    Lin, Jinzhong
    Fuglsang, Anders
    Peng, Xu
    Brodersen, Ditlev E.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)
  • [19] A Type I-F Anti-CRISPR Protein Inhibits the CRISPR-Cas Surveillance Complex by ADP-Ribosylation
    Niu, Yiying
    Yang, Lingguang
    Gao, Teng
    Dong, Changpeng
    Zhang, Buyu
    Yin, Peipei
    Hopp, Ann-Katrin
    Li, Dongdong
    Gan, Rui
    Wang, Hongou
    Liu, Xi
    Cao, Xueli
    Xie, Yongchao
    Meng, Xianbin
    Deng, Haiteng
    Zhang, Xiaohui
    Ren, Jie
    Hottiger, Michael O.
    Chen, Zeliang
    Zhang, Yi
    Liu, Xiaoyun
    Feng, Yue
    MOLECULAR CELL, 2020, 80 (03) : 512 - +
  • [20] Structural insights into the inactivation of CRISPR-Cas systems by diverse anti-CRISPR proteins
    Zhu, Yuwei
    Zhang, Fan
    Huang, Zhiwei
    BMC BIOLOGY, 2018, 16