Comparison of the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems used in oral and maxillofacial surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Barzi Gareb
Charlotte C. Roossien
Nico B. van Bakelen
Gijsbertus J. Verkerke
Arjan Vissink
Ruud R. M. Bos
Baucke van Minnen
机构
[1] University Medical Center Groningen,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
[2] University of Groningen,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
[3] University Medical Center Groningen,Department of Biomechanical Engineering
[4] University of Groningen,undefined
[5] University of Twente,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To guide the selection of osteosynthesis systems, this study compared the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems. SonicPins Rx and xG were subjected to pull-out tests. Additionally, 15 biodegradable (Inion CPS 2.0 and 2.5 mm; LactoSorb 2.0 mm; Macropore 2.0 mm; Polymax 2.0 mm; BioSorb FX 2.0 mm; ResorbX 2.1 mm; Osteotrans-MX 2.0 mm with plate thicknesses 1.0 and 1.4 mm; SonicWeld Rxplate/Rxpins, xGplate/Rxpins and xGplate/xGpins 2.1 mm without and with tapping the burr hole) and six titanium (CrossDrive (2006), CrossDrive (2018), MaxDrive; all 1.5 and 2.0 mm) straight, four-hole osteosynthesis systems were evaluated. All systems were subjected to tensile, bending and torsion tests. Pull-out loads of the SonicPins were comparable (P = 0.423). Titanium systems’ tensile loads were higher than biodegradable systems (P < 0.001). CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive systems’ tensile and torsional stiffness were lower, accompanied with higher ductility, than corresponding CrossDrive (2006) systems (P < 0.001). Bending stiffness of 1.5 mm titanium systems was comparable to, and of the 2.0 mm systems higher than, all biodegradable systems (P < 0.001). Regarding biodegradable systems, Inion CPS 2.5 mm had highest tensile load and torsional stiffness, SonicWeld 2.1 mm highest tensile stiffness, and BioSorbFX 2.0 mm highest bending stiffness (P < 0.001). On the basis of the results of this study, the CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive 1.5 mm titanium systems are recommended for midface fractures (e.g., zygomatic or maxillary fractures) and osteotomies (e.g., Le Fort I osteotomy), and the CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive 2.0 mm titanium systems for mandibular fractures and osteotomies when a titanium osteosynthesis system is used. When there is an indication for a biodegradable osteosynthesis system, the SonicWeld 2.1 mm or BioSorbFX 2.0 mm are recommended for midface fractures and osteotomies, and the Inion CPS 2.5 mm biodegradable system for mandibular osteotomies and non-load bearing mandibular fractures, especially when high torsional forces are expected (e.g., mandibular symphysis fractures).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost minimization analysis of indication-specific osteosynthesis material in oral and maxillofacial surgery
    Franke, Adrian
    Weiland, Bernhard
    Buckova, Michaela
    Braeuer, Christian
    Lauer, Gunter
    Leonhardt, Henry
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2024, 28 (01): : 179 - 184
  • [22] Cost minimization analysis of indication-specific osteosynthesis material in oral and maxillofacial surgery
    Adrian Franke
    Bernhard Weiland
    Michaela Bučkova
    Christian Bräuer
    Günter Lauer
    Henry Leonhardt
    Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2024, 28 : 179 - 184
  • [23] Biodegradable versus titanium osteosynthesis in maxillofacial traumatology: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
    Gareb, B.
    van Bakelen, N. B.
    Dijkstra, P. U.
    Vissink, A.
    Bos, R. R. M.
    van Minnen, B.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2020, 49 (07) : 914 - 931
  • [24] Letter to the Editor: Can ChatGPT be used in oral and maxillofacial surgery?
    Azadi, Ali
    Baghban, Alireza Akbarzadeh
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 125 (02)
  • [26] Efficacy and safety of biodegradable osteofixation devices in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review
    Buijs, G. J.
    Stegenga, B.
    Bos, R. R. M.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2006, 85 (11) : 980 - 989
  • [27] Bioresorbable Plate Systems for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Review
    Ahmed, Rezin
    Muthusekhar, M. R.
    Murugan, Senthil P.
    JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9 (09): : 215 - 222
  • [28] A titanium arch bar for 14 maxillomandibular fixation in oral and maxillofacial surgery
    Iizuka, T
    Hallermann, W
    Seto, I
    Smolka, W
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2006, 64 (06) : 989 - 992
  • [29] Instruments Used in American Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: The Person Behind the Name
    Laskin, Daniel M.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2015, 73 (06) : 1181.e1 - 1181.e6
  • [30] Mechanical strength and stiffness of biodegradable and titanium osteofixation systems
    Buijs, Gerrit J.
    van der Houwen, Eduard B.
    Bos, Rudulf R. M.
    Verkerke, Gijsbertus J.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2007, 65 (11) : 2148 - 2158