Comparison of the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems used in oral and maxillofacial surgery

被引:0
|
作者
Barzi Gareb
Charlotte C. Roossien
Nico B. van Bakelen
Gijsbertus J. Verkerke
Arjan Vissink
Ruud R. M. Bos
Baucke van Minnen
机构
[1] University Medical Center Groningen,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
[2] University of Groningen,Department of Rehabilitation Medicine
[3] University Medical Center Groningen,Department of Biomechanical Engineering
[4] University of Groningen,undefined
[5] University of Twente,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To guide the selection of osteosynthesis systems, this study compared the mechanical properties of biodegradable and titanium osteosynthesis systems. SonicPins Rx and xG were subjected to pull-out tests. Additionally, 15 biodegradable (Inion CPS 2.0 and 2.5 mm; LactoSorb 2.0 mm; Macropore 2.0 mm; Polymax 2.0 mm; BioSorb FX 2.0 mm; ResorbX 2.1 mm; Osteotrans-MX 2.0 mm with plate thicknesses 1.0 and 1.4 mm; SonicWeld Rxplate/Rxpins, xGplate/Rxpins and xGplate/xGpins 2.1 mm without and with tapping the burr hole) and six titanium (CrossDrive (2006), CrossDrive (2018), MaxDrive; all 1.5 and 2.0 mm) straight, four-hole osteosynthesis systems were evaluated. All systems were subjected to tensile, bending and torsion tests. Pull-out loads of the SonicPins were comparable (P = 0.423). Titanium systems’ tensile loads were higher than biodegradable systems (P < 0.001). CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive systems’ tensile and torsional stiffness were lower, accompanied with higher ductility, than corresponding CrossDrive (2006) systems (P < 0.001). Bending stiffness of 1.5 mm titanium systems was comparable to, and of the 2.0 mm systems higher than, all biodegradable systems (P < 0.001). Regarding biodegradable systems, Inion CPS 2.5 mm had highest tensile load and torsional stiffness, SonicWeld 2.1 mm highest tensile stiffness, and BioSorbFX 2.0 mm highest bending stiffness (P < 0.001). On the basis of the results of this study, the CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive 1.5 mm titanium systems are recommended for midface fractures (e.g., zygomatic or maxillary fractures) and osteotomies (e.g., Le Fort I osteotomy), and the CrossDrive (2018) and MaxDrive 2.0 mm titanium systems for mandibular fractures and osteotomies when a titanium osteosynthesis system is used. When there is an indication for a biodegradable osteosynthesis system, the SonicWeld 2.1 mm or BioSorbFX 2.0 mm are recommended for midface fractures and osteotomies, and the Inion CPS 2.5 mm biodegradable system for mandibular osteotomies and non-load bearing mandibular fractures, especially when high torsional forces are expected (e.g., mandibular symphysis fractures).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Study of the electrochemical behaviour of Ti osteosynthesis plates used in maxillofacial surgery
    Suba, C.
    Lakatos-Varsanyi, M.
    Miko, A.
    Kovacs, L.
    Velich, N.
    Kadar, B.
    Szabo, G.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING, 2007, 447 (1-2): : 347 - 354
  • [12] Can ChatGPT be used in oral and maxillofacial surgery?
    Balel, Yunus
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 124 (05)
  • [13] Comparison of Biodegradable and Titanium Fixation Systems in Maxillofacial Surgery: A Two-year Multi-center Randomized Controlled Trial
    van Bakelen, N. B.
    Buijs, G. J.
    Jansma, J.
    de Visscher, J. G. A. M.
    Hoppenreijs, Th. J. M.
    Bergsma, J. E.
    Stegenga, B.
    Bos, R. R. M.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2013, 92 (12) : 1100 - 1105
  • [14] Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: to remove or remain? A retrospective study
    Pan, Z.
    Patil, P. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND EMERGENCY SURGERY, 2014, 40 (05) : 587 - 591
  • [15] Titanium osteosynthesis hardware in maxillofacial trauma surgery: to remove or remain? A retrospective study
    Z. Pan
    P. M. Patil
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, 2014, 40 : 587 - 591
  • [16] A CLINICAL STUDY OF BIODEGRADABLE PLATES AND SCREWS IN ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
    Kim, Il-Kyu
    Park, Seung-Hoon
    Jang, Keum-Soo
    Yang, Jung-Eun
    Jang, Jae-Won
    Sasikala, Balaraman
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ASSOCIATION OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGEONS, 2009, 35 (06) : 451 - 458
  • [17] Complications of Local Anesthesia Used in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Cummings, David R.
    Yamashita, Dennis-Duke R.
    McAndrews, James P.
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2011, 23 (03) : 369 - +
  • [18] CUSTOM PROSTHESES USED TO SUPPORT ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY
    KRAUT, RA
    CONNELLY, ME
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1984, 51 (05): : 663 - 668
  • [19] Mechanical characterization of biodegradable materials used in surgery
    Andrzejewska, Angela
    INNOVATIONS IN BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 623 : 399 - 408
  • [20] Biodegradable plates in oral and maxillofacial surgery in children. Preliminary report
    Iatrou, I.
    Theologie-Lygidakis, N.
    Tzerbos, F.
    Alexandridis, K.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE XVIII CONGRESS OF THE EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION FOR CRANIO-MAXILLO FACIAL SURGERY, 2006, : 183 - +