Unethical human research in the field of neuroscience: a historical review

被引:0
|
作者
Hussein Algahtani
Mohammed Bajunaid
Bader Shirah
机构
[1] King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,King Abdulaziz Medical City
[2] King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
[3] King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,undefined
来源
Neurological Sciences | 2018年 / 39卷
关键词
Unethical research; Ethics; History; Neuroscience;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the historical foundations of ethics in human research are key to illuminating future human research and clinical trials. This paper gives an overview of the most remarkable unethical human research and how past misconducts helped develop ethical guidelines on human experimentation such as The Nuremberg Code 1947 following WWII. Unethical research in the field of neuroscience also proved to be incredibly distressing. Participants were often left with life-long cognitive disabilities. This emphasizes the importance of implicating strict rules and ethical guidelines in neuroscience research that protect participants and respects their dignity. The experiments conducted by German Nazi in the concentration camps during WWII are probably the most inhumane and brutal ever conducted. The Nuremberg Code of 1947, one of the few positive outcomes of the Nazi experiments, is often considered the first document to set out ethical regulations of human research. It consists of numerous necessary criteria, to highlight a few, the subject must give informed consent, there must be a concrete scientific basis for the experiment, and the experiment should yield positive results that cannot be obtained in any other way. In the end, we must remember, the interest of the patient must always prevail over the interest of science or society.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 834
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Contributions of non-human primates to neuroscience research
    Capitanio, John P.
    Emborg, Marina E.
    LANCET, 2008, 371 (9618): : 1126 - 1135
  • [42] Non-Human Primate Models in Neuroscience Research
    Perretta, G.
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2009, 36 (01) : 77 - 85
  • [43] Ethics and social policy in research on the neuroscience of human sexuality
    Wolpe, PR
    NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2004, 7 (10) : 1031 - 1033
  • [44] Citation of unethical research - Reply
    Dennis, DT
    Inglesby, TV
    O'Toole, T
    Henderson, DA
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (04): : 453 - 453
  • [45] Research trends, hot spots and prospects for necroptosis in the field of neuroscience
    Wei-Tao Yan
    Shuang Lu
    Yan-Di Yang
    Wen-Ya Ning
    Yan Cai
    Xi-Min Hu
    Qi Zhang
    Kun Xiong
    Neural Regeneration Research, 2021, 16 (08) : 1628 - 1637
  • [46] The Neurosciences Research Program at MIT and the Beginning of the Modern Field of Neuroscience
    Adelman, George
    JOURNAL OF THE HISTORY OF THE NEUROSCIENCES, 2010, 19 (01) : 15 - 23
  • [47] Research trends, hot spots and prospects for necroptosis in the field of neuroscience
    Yan, Wei-Tao
    Lu, Shuang
    Yang, Yan-Di
    Ning, Wen-Ya
    Cai, Yan
    Hu, Xi-Min
    Zhang, Qi
    Xiong, Kun
    NEURAL REGENERATION RESEARCH, 2021, 16 (08) : 1628 - 1637
  • [48] Historical review: the field of protein methylation
    Paik, Woon Ki
    Paik, David C.
    Kim, Sangduk
    TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES, 2007, 32 (03) : 146 - 152
  • [49] Steer clear of unethical research
    Cundall, Geoffrey
    PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 21 (11) : 17 - 18
  • [50] Who's research is unethical?
    Wills, JA
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2002, 45 (04) : 16 - 16