Unethical human research in the field of neuroscience: a historical review

被引:0
|
作者
Hussein Algahtani
Mohammed Bajunaid
Bader Shirah
机构
[1] King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,King Abdulaziz Medical City
[2] King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
[3] King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,undefined
来源
Neurological Sciences | 2018年 / 39卷
关键词
Unethical research; Ethics; History; Neuroscience;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the historical foundations of ethics in human research are key to illuminating future human research and clinical trials. This paper gives an overview of the most remarkable unethical human research and how past misconducts helped develop ethical guidelines on human experimentation such as The Nuremberg Code 1947 following WWII. Unethical research in the field of neuroscience also proved to be incredibly distressing. Participants were often left with life-long cognitive disabilities. This emphasizes the importance of implicating strict rules and ethical guidelines in neuroscience research that protect participants and respects their dignity. The experiments conducted by German Nazi in the concentration camps during WWII are probably the most inhumane and brutal ever conducted. The Nuremberg Code of 1947, one of the few positive outcomes of the Nazi experiments, is often considered the first document to set out ethical regulations of human research. It consists of numerous necessary criteria, to highlight a few, the subject must give informed consent, there must be a concrete scientific basis for the experiment, and the experiment should yield positive results that cannot be obtained in any other way. In the end, we must remember, the interest of the patient must always prevail over the interest of science or society.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 834
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Research Review: A neuroscience framework for pediatric anxiety disorders
    Pine, Daniel S.
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 48 (07) : 631 - 648
  • [32] Annual Research Review: Educational neuroscience: progress and prospects
    Thomas, Michael S. C.
    Ansari, Daniel
    Knowland, Victoria C. P.
    JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 60 (04) : 477 - 492
  • [33] The judicial archives and the field of historical research
    Seriu, Naoko
    ATELIER DU CENTRE DE RECHERCHES HISTORIQUES, 2009, (05):
  • [34] The victims of unethical human experiments and coerced research under National Socialism
    Weindling, Paul
    von Villiez, Anna
    Loewenau, Aleksandra
    Farron, Nichola
    ENDEAVOUR, 2016, 40 (01) : 1 - 6
  • [35] Research ethics aspects of experimentation with LSD on human subjects: a historical and ethical review
    Bodnar, Kristof Janos
    Kakuk, Peter
    MEDICINE HEALTH CARE AND PHILOSOPHY, 2019, 22 (02) : 327 - 337
  • [36] Research ethics aspects of experimentation with LSD on human subjects: a historical and ethical review
    Kristóf János Bodnár
    Péter Kakuk
    Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2019, 22 : 327 - 337
  • [37] Brain organoids: A new frontier of human neuroscience research
    Lancaster, Madeline A.
    SEMINARS IN CELL & DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2021, 111 : 1 - 3
  • [38] Adult human brain cell culture for neuroscience research
    Gibbons, Hannah M.
    Dragunow, Mike
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY, 2010, 42 (06): : 844 - 856
  • [39] Guidelines for Inclusive and Diverse Human Neuroscience Research Practices
    Caspar, Emilie A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 44 (48):
  • [40] Ethics and social policy in research on the neuroscience of human sexuality
    Paul R Wolpe
    Nature Neuroscience, 2004, 7 : 1031 - 1033