Unethical human research in the field of neuroscience: a historical review

被引:0
|
作者
Hussein Algahtani
Mohammed Bajunaid
Bader Shirah
机构
[1] King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,King Abdulaziz Medical City
[2] King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,King Abdullah International Medical Research Center
[3] King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences,undefined
来源
Neurological Sciences | 2018年 / 39卷
关键词
Unethical research; Ethics; History; Neuroscience;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the historical foundations of ethics in human research are key to illuminating future human research and clinical trials. This paper gives an overview of the most remarkable unethical human research and how past misconducts helped develop ethical guidelines on human experimentation such as The Nuremberg Code 1947 following WWII. Unethical research in the field of neuroscience also proved to be incredibly distressing. Participants were often left with life-long cognitive disabilities. This emphasizes the importance of implicating strict rules and ethical guidelines in neuroscience research that protect participants and respects their dignity. The experiments conducted by German Nazi in the concentration camps during WWII are probably the most inhumane and brutal ever conducted. The Nuremberg Code of 1947, one of the few positive outcomes of the Nazi experiments, is often considered the first document to set out ethical regulations of human research. It consists of numerous necessary criteria, to highlight a few, the subject must give informed consent, there must be a concrete scientific basis for the experiment, and the experiment should yield positive results that cannot be obtained in any other way. In the end, we must remember, the interest of the patient must always prevail over the interest of science or society.
引用
收藏
页码:829 / 834
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unethical human research in the field of neuroscience: a historical review
    Algahtani, Hussein
    Bajunaid, Mohammed
    Shirah, Bader
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 39 (05) : 829 - 834
  • [2] Exposing Unethical Human Research
    Spiro, Howard M.
    ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 156 (10) : 754 - 754
  • [3] Research Update in Neuroscience for Neurosurgeons: a historical perspective
    Reseland, Eric
    Agarwal, Nitin
    McDowell, Michael M.
    Stone, Jeremy G.
    Tonetti, Daniel A.
    Awad, Issam A.
    Hodge, Charles J.
    Koenig, Karen S.
    Friedman, Allan H.
    Friedlander, Robert M.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 131 (02) : 639 - 648
  • [4] Unethical leadership: A review, analysis, and research agenda
    Mitchell, Marie S.
    Rivera, Gabriela
    Trevino, Linda Klebe
    PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 76 (02) : 547 - 583
  • [5] A Visualized Review of Research on Unethical Behavior in Organizations
    Yuan, Yiwei
    Zhu, Li
    Li, Qiao
    Liu, Jun
    Liu, Chao
    Chen, Chunhua
    BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2025,
  • [6] The Neuroscience of Morality: A Review of Research
    Simic, Natasa
    PSIHOLOGIJSKE TEME, 2021, 30 (02): : 225 - 250
  • [7] Unethical Leadership: Review, Synthesis and Directions for Future Research
    Sharfa Hassan
    Puneet Kaur
    Michael Muchiri
    Chidiebere Ogbonnaya
    Amandeep Dhir
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, 183 : 511 - 550
  • [8] Unethical Leadership: Review, Synthesis and Directions for Future Research
    Hassan, Sharfa
    Kaur, Puneet
    Muchiri, Michael
    Ogbonnaya, Chidiebere
    Dhir, Amandeep
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2023, 183 (02) : 511 - 550
  • [9] Unethical research
    V. Sahni
    British Dental Journal, 2023, 234 : 556 - 557
  • [10] Unethical research
    Wiley, B
    IEEE SPECTRUM, 2002, 39 (10) : 10 - +