Integrating modality-specific expectancies for the deployment of spatial attention

被引:0
|
作者
Paola Mengotti
Frank Boers
Pascasie L. Dombert
Gereon R. Fink
Simone Vossel
机构
[1] Institute of Neuroscience & Medicine (INM-3),Cognitive Neuroscience
[2] Research Centre Juelich,Institute of Neuroscience & Medicine (INM
[3] Research Centre Juelich,4)
[4] University Hospital Cologne,Department of Neurology
[5] University of Cologne,Department of Psychology
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The deployment of spatial attention is highly sensitive to stimulus predictability. Despite evidence for strong crossmodal links in spatial attentional systems, it remains to be elucidated how concurrent but divergent predictions for targets in different sensory modalities are integrated. In a series of behavioral studies, we investigated the processing of modality-specific expectancies using a multimodal cueing paradigm in which auditory cues predicted the location of visual or tactile targets with modality-specific cue predictability. The cue predictability for visual and tactile targets was manipulated independently. A Bayesian ideal observer model with a weighting factor was applied to trial-wise individual response speed to investigate how the two probabilistic contexts are integrated. Results showed that the degree of integration depended on the level of predictability and on the divergence of the modality-specific probabilistic contexts (Experiments 1–2). However, when the two probabilistic contexts were matched in their level of predictability and were highly divergent (Experiment 3), higher separate processing was favored, especially when visual targets were processed. These findings suggest that modality-specific predictions are flexibly integrated according to their reliability, supporting the hypothesis of separate modality-specific attentional systems that are however linked to guarantee an efficient deployment of spatial attention across the senses.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Modality-specific control processes in verbal versus spatial working memory
    Watter, Scott
    Heisz, Jennifer J.
    Karle, James W.
    Shedden, Judith M.
    Kiss, Ivan
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1347 : 90 - 103
  • [32] Interrelations Between Temporal and Spatial Cognition: The Role of Modality-Specific Processing
    Loeffler, Jonna
    Canal-Bruland, Rouwen
    Schroeger, Anna
    Tolentino-Castro, J. Walter
    Raab, Markus
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [33] Multi-Modal Retinal Image Classification With Modality-Specific Attention Network
    He, Xingxin
    Deng, Ying
    Fang, Leyuan
    Peng, Qinghua
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2021, 40 (06) : 1591 - 1602
  • [34] Modality-Specific Cross-Modal Similarity Measurement With Recurrent Attention Network
    Peng, Yuxin
    Qi, Jinwei
    Yuan, Yuxin
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2018, 27 (11) : 5585 - 5599
  • [36] VISUAL TRACKING OF MULTIPLE MOVING-OBJECTS REQUIRES MODALITY-SPECIFIC ATTENTION
    WEN, J
    KOCH, C
    BRAUN, J
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 1995, 36 (04) : S900 - S900
  • [37] Modality-specific tracking of attention and sensory statistics in the human electrophysiological spectral exponent
    Waschke, Leonhard
    Donoghue, Thomas
    Fiedler, Lorenz
    Smith, Sydney
    Garrett, Douglas D.
    Voytek, Bradley
    Obleser, Jonas
    ELIFE, 2021, 10
  • [39] Evidence for modality-specific but not frequency-specific modulation of human primary auditory cortex by attention
    Gander, P. E.
    Bosnyak, D. J.
    Roberts, L. E.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2010, 268 (1-2) : 213 - 226
  • [40] Modality-specific attention and multisensory integration of emotions in schizophrenia: Reduced regulatory effects
    de Jong, J. J.
    Hodiamont, P. P. G.
    de Gelder, B.
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2010, 122 (1-3) : 136 - 143