Integrating modality-specific expectancies for the deployment of spatial attention

被引:0
|
作者
Paola Mengotti
Frank Boers
Pascasie L. Dombert
Gereon R. Fink
Simone Vossel
机构
[1] Institute of Neuroscience & Medicine (INM-3),Cognitive Neuroscience
[2] Research Centre Juelich,Institute of Neuroscience & Medicine (INM
[3] Research Centre Juelich,4)
[4] University Hospital Cologne,Department of Neurology
[5] University of Cologne,Department of Psychology
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The deployment of spatial attention is highly sensitive to stimulus predictability. Despite evidence for strong crossmodal links in spatial attentional systems, it remains to be elucidated how concurrent but divergent predictions for targets in different sensory modalities are integrated. In a series of behavioral studies, we investigated the processing of modality-specific expectancies using a multimodal cueing paradigm in which auditory cues predicted the location of visual or tactile targets with modality-specific cue predictability. The cue predictability for visual and tactile targets was manipulated independently. A Bayesian ideal observer model with a weighting factor was applied to trial-wise individual response speed to investigate how the two probabilistic contexts are integrated. Results showed that the degree of integration depended on the level of predictability and on the divergence of the modality-specific probabilistic contexts (Experiments 1–2). However, when the two probabilistic contexts were matched in their level of predictability and were highly divergent (Experiment 3), higher separate processing was favored, especially when visual targets were processed. These findings suggest that modality-specific predictions are flexibly integrated according to their reliability, supporting the hypothesis of separate modality-specific attentional systems that are however linked to guarantee an efficient deployment of spatial attention across the senses.
引用
下载
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Modality-specific forgetting
    Ashleigh M. Maxcey
    Laura Janakiefski
    Emma Megla
    Madison Smerdell
    Samantha Stallkamp
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2019, 26 : 622 - 633
  • [22] Visual-haptic cue weighting is independent of modality-specific attention
    Helbig, Hannah B.
    Ernst, Marc O.
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2008, 8 (01):
  • [23] Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention
    Mozolic, Jennifer L.
    Joyner, David
    Hugenschmidt, Christina E.
    Peiffer, Ann M.
    Kraft, Robert A.
    Maldjian, Joseph A.
    Laurienti, Paul J.
    BMC NEUROLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
  • [24] ATTENTION AND MODALITY-SPECIFIC INTERFERENCE IN VISUAL SHORT-TERM-MEMORY
    PROCTOR, RW
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY, 1978, 4 (03): : 239 - 245
  • [25] Differences of IQ among ADHD children with modality-specific attention problem
    Jungwoo Son
    Byeongjin Han
    Annals of General Psychiatry, 5 (Suppl 1)
  • [26] Cross-modal deactivations during modality-specific selective attention
    Jennifer L Mozolic
    David Joyner
    Christina E Hugenschmidt
    Ann M Peiffer
    Robert A Kraft
    Joseph A Maldjian
    Paul J Laurienti
    BMC Neurology, 8
  • [27] How modality-specific is morphology?
    Miozzo, Michele
    Shuster, Victoria P.
    Fischer-Baum, Simon
    COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 35 (07) : 371 - 384
  • [28] Weighted Integration of Duration Information Across Visual and Auditory Modality Is Influenced by Modality-Specific Attention
    Yoshimatsu, Hiroshi
    Yotsumoto, Yuko
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15
  • [29] A MODALITY-SPECIFIC CASE OF DYSCALCULIA
    MCNEIL, J
    WARRINGTON, EK
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 15 (03) : 415 - 415
  • [30] MODALITY-SPECIFIC PHONOLOGICAL ALEXIA
    FRIEDMAN, RB
    BEEMAN, M
    LOTT, SN
    LINK, K
    GRAFMAN, J
    ROBINSON, S
    COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 10 (06) : 549 - 568