Cross-validation of a mass spectrometric-based method for the therapeutic drug monitoring of irinotecan: implementation of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry in pharmacokinetic measurements

被引:0
|
作者
Eleonora Calandra
Bianca Posocco
Sara Crotti
Elena Marangon
Luciana Giodini
Donato Nitti
Giuseppe Toffoli
Pietro Traldi
Marco Agostini
机构
[1] Pediatric Research Institute,Lab. NIB
[2] IRCCS-National Cancer Institute,Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology Division, Department of Translational Research
[3] University of Padova,Surgical Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences
[4] IENI CNR,Department of Nanomedicine
[5] The Methodist Hospital Research Institute,undefined
来源
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry | 2016年 / 408卷
关键词
MALDI-TOF; Irinotecan; Bioanalytical methods; Drug monitoring/drug screening;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Irinotecan is a widely used antineoplastic drug, mostly employed for the treatment of colorectal cancer. This drug is a feasible candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring due to the presence of a wide inter-individual variability in the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. In order to determine the drug concentration during the administration protocol, we developed a quantitative MALDI-MS method using CHCA as MALDI matrix. Here, we demonstrate that MALDI-TOF can be applied in a routine setting for therapeutic drug monitoring in humans offering quick and accurate results. To reach this aim, we cross validated, according to FDA and EMA guidelines, the MALDI-TOF method in comparison with a standard LC-MS/MS method, applying it for the quantification of 108 patients’ plasma samples from a clinical trial. Standard curves for irinotecan were linear (R2 ≥ 0.9842) over the concentration ranges between 300 and 10,000 ng/mL and showed good back-calculated accuracy and precision. Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy, determined on three quality control levels were always <12.8 % and between 90.1 and 106.9 %, respectively. The cross-validation procedure showed a good reproducibility between the two methods, the percentage differences within 20 % in more than 70 % of the total amount of clinical samples analysed.
引用
收藏
页码:5369 / 5377
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条