“Phoenix Contact”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) 28 April 2022 – Case No. C-44/21

被引：0

作者：

机构：

来源：

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law | 2022年 / 53卷 / 5期

关键词：

European patent; Interim measures; Power of national judicial authorities; Interlocutory injunction; Infringement; Opposition or invalidity proceedings;

D O I：

10.1007/s40319-022-01198-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Article 9(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as precluding national case-law under which applications for interim relief for patent infringement must, in principle, be dismissed where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings.

引用

页码：778 / 778

共 50 条

[41] “Stim and SAMI”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 2 April 20209 – Case No. C-753/18 (ECLI:EU:C:2020:268)
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2020, 51 (5) : 651 - 651
[42] “Gömböc”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 23 April 2020 – Case No. C-237/19 (ECLI:EU:C:2020:296)
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2020, 51 (5) : 666 - 667
[43] “PE Digital (Parship)”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) 8 October 2020 – Case No. C-641/19; ECLI:EU:C:2020:808
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2021, 52 : 80 - 81
[44] "Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen na Zycie" Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 3 April 2019-Case No. C-617/17
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2019, 50 (09) : 1166 - 1166
[45] “Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 3 April 2019 – Case No. C-617/17
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, 50 : 1166 - 1166
[46] “Impulse”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 3 September 2015 – Case No. C-125/14
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2016, 47 (1) : 112 - 113
[47] “Syed”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 19 December 2018 – Case No. C-572/17
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, 50 : 499 - 499
[48] “Genentech”Decision of the European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 7 July 2016 – Case No. C-567/14
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017, 48 (2) : 233 - 233
[49] “Hassan”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) 4 February 2016 – Case No. C-163/15
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017, 48 (3) : 363 - 363
[50] “Hartwall”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 27 March 2019 – Case No. C-578/17
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, 50 (7) : 905 - 906

← 1 2 3 4 5 →