“Powszechny Zakład Ubezpieczeń na Życie”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 3 April 2019 – Case No. C-617/17

被引：0

作者：

机构：

来源：

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law | 2019年 / 50卷

关键词：

Abuse of a dominant position; Application of national competition law; National competition authority imposing one fine based on national law and another based on EU law; Principle of ; Applicability; Same facts or same offence;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The principle of ne bis in idem enshrined in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, proclaimed in Nice on 7 December 2000, must be interpreted as not precluding a national competition authority from fining an undertaking in a single decision for an infringement of national competition law and for an infringement of Article 82 EC. In such a situation, the national competition authority must nevertheless ensure that the fines are proportionate to the nature of the infringement.

引用

页码：1166 / 1166

共 50 条

[1] "Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen na Zycie" Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 3 April 2019-Case No. C-617/17
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2019, 50 (09) : 1166 - 1166
[2] “Hartwall”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 27 March 2019 – Case No. C-578/17
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, 50 (7) : 905 - 906
[3] “Abraxis Bioscience”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 21 March 2019 – Case No. C-443/17
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, 50 (6) : 746 - 746
[4] “ÖKO-Test Verlag”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 11 April 2019 – Case No. C-690/17
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, 50 : 1024 - 1024
[5] “Syed”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 19 December 2018 – Case No. C-572/17
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, 50 : 499 - 499
[6] “ACI Adam”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 10 April 2014 – Case No. C-435/12
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2015, 46 (1) : 134 - 134
[7] "oKO-Test Verlag" Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber)11 April 2019-Case No. C-690/17
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2019, 50 (08) : 1024 - 1024
[8] "Syed": Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 19 December 2018-Case No. C-572/17
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2019, 50 (04) : 499 - 499
[9] “Impulse”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) 3 September 2015 – Case No. C-125/14
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2016, 47 (1) : 112 - 113
[10] “Spiegel Online”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 29 July 2019 – Case No. C-516/17
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2019, 50 : 1158 - 1159

← 1 2 3 4 5 →