“Phoenix Contact”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) 28 April 2022 – Case No. C-44/21

被引：0

作者：

机构：

来源：

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law | 2022年 / 53卷 / 5期

关键词：

European patent; Interim measures; Power of national judicial authorities; Interlocutory injunction; Infringement; Opposition or invalidity proceedings;

D O I：

10.1007/s40319-022-01198-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Article 9(1) of Directive 2004/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the enforcement of intellectual property rights must be interpreted as precluding national case-law under which applications for interim relief for patent infringement must, in principle, be dismissed where the validity of the patent in question has not been confirmed, at the very least, by a decision given at first instance in opposition or invalidity proceedings.

引用

页码：778 / 778

共 50 条

[1] “Scotch Whisky Association”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 7 June 2018 – Case No. C-44/17
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2018, 49 (8) : 996 - 997
[2] “Classic Coach Company”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) 2 June 2022 – Case No. C 112/21
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2022, 53 : 1143 - 1143
[3] “Austro-Mechana”Decision of the European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 21 April 2016 – Case No. C-572/14
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2016, 47 (8) : 986 - 986
[4] European Union "Austro-Mechana" Decision of the European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 21 April 2016 - Case No. C-572/14
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2016, 47 (08) : 986 - 986
[5] "Classic Coach Company" Decision of the European Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) 2 June 2022-Case No. C 112/21
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2022, 53 (7) : 1143 - 1143
[6] JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE (Tenth Chamber) of April 28, 2022
不详
REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO CANONICO Y DERECHO ECLESIASTICO DEL ESTADO, 2022, (59):
[7] “Citadines”Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) 11 April 2024 – Case No. C-723/22; ECLI:EU:C:2024:289
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2024, 55 (9) : 1526 - 1526
[8] “Filmspeler”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 26 April 2017 – Case No. C-527/15
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2017, 48 (7) : 875 - 875
[9] “Maxxus Group”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) 10 March 2022 – Case No. C-183/21; ECLI:EU:C:2022:174
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2022, 53 (4) : 637 - 637
[10] “bpost”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 22 March 2022 – Case No. C-117/20
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2022, 53 (8) : 1282 - 1282

← 1 2 3 4 5 →