“Maxxus Group”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) 10 March 2022 – Case No. C-183/21; ECLI:EU:C:2022:174

被引：0

作者：

机构：

来源：

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law | 2022年 / 53卷 / 4期

关键词：

Genuine use; Burden of proof; Non-use; Application for revocation; National procedural rules; Market research; Substantiated submissions supporting application;

D O I：

10.1007/s40319-022-01184-9

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Article 19 of Directive (EU) 2015/2436 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2015 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks must be interpreted as precluding a procedural rule of a Member State which, in proceedings concerning an application for revocation of a trade mark for non-use, requires the applicant to carry out market research concerning the possible use of that mark by its proprietor and to make in that regard, to the extent possible, substantiated submissions in support of its application.

引用

页码：637 / 637

共 50 条

[1] “Perfumesco.pl”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) 13 October 2022 – Case No. C-355/21; ECLI:EU:C:2022:791
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2022, 53 : 1575 - 1575
[2] "Papierfabriek Doetinchem" Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Tenth Chamber) 2 March 2023 Case No. C-684/21; ECLI:EU:C:2023:141
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2023, 54 (05) : 797 - 797
[3] “Gemeinde Bodman-Ludwigshafen”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 13 October 2022 – Case No. C-256/21; ECLI:EU:C:2022:786
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2023, 54 (1) : 143 - 143
[4] “Papierfabriek Doetinchem”Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Tenth Chamber) 2 March 2023 – Case No. C-684/21; ECLI:EU:C:2023:141
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2023, 54 : 797 - 797
[5] "Perfumesco.pl" Decision of the European Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) 13 October 2022-Case No. C-355/21; ECLI:EU:C:2022:791
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2022, 53 (10) : 1575 - 1575
[6] “LEA”Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) 21 March 2024 – Case No. C-10/22; ECLI:EU:C:2024:254
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2024, 55 (8) : 1348 - 1348
[7] “Classic Coach Company”Decision of the European Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) 2 June 2022 – Case No. C 112/21
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2022, 53 : 1143 - 1143
[8] “Legea”Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Tenth Chamber) 27 April 2023 – Case No. C-686/21; ECLI:EU:C:2023:357
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2023, 54 : 1452 - 1452
[9] “LM”Decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (Tenth Chamber) 27 April 2023 – Case No. C-654/21; ECLI:EU:C:2023:462
IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 2023, 54 (10) : 1613 - 1613
[10] "Classic Coach Company" Decision of the European Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) 2 June 2022-Case No. C 112/21
不详
IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COMPETITION LAW, 2022, 53 (7) : 1143 - 1143

← 1 2 3 4 5 →