Discrete choice experiments in health economics: For better or for worse?

被引：62
|
作者：
Bryan S. [1 ,5 ]
Dolan P. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构：
[1] Health Services Management Centre, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham
[2] Sch. of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield
[3] Department of Economics, University of Sheffield
[4] Department of Economics, University of Oslo
[5] Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2RT
来源：
The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC | 2004年 / 5卷 / 3期
关键词：
Discrete choice experiments; Health economics;
D O I：
10.1007/s10198-004-0241-6
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
One method that is increasingly being used in health economics to elicit stated preferences concerning health matters is the discrete choice experiment (DCE). This editorial explores four sets of issues facing researchers who wish to employ DCE techniques: (a) normative issues about how data from DCE studies might be used to inform policy, (b) psychological issues conv cerning the meaningfulness of the data generated, (d) technical issues relating to how the data are generated and (d) issues relating to the generalisability of the data from DCE studies. Given current uncertainties surrounding these issues, it is our view that more caution and greater circumspection towards DCE is appropriate at this stage.
引用
收藏
页码：199 / 202
页数：3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Labeled versus Unlabeled Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: An Application to Colorectal Cancer Screening
    de Bekker-Grob, Esther W.
    Hol, Lieke
    Donkers, Bas
    van Dam, Leonie
    Habbema, J. Dik F.
    van Leerdam, Monique E.
    Kuipers, Ernst J.
    Essink-Bot, Marie-Louise
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2010, 13 (02) : 315 - 323
  • [12] Better is worse, worse is better: Reexamination of violations of dominance in intertemporal choice
    Jiang, Cheng-Ming
    Sun, Hong-Mei
    Zhu, Long-Fei
    Zhao, Lei
    Liu, Hong-Zhi
    Sun, Hong-Yue
    JUDGMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 12 (03): : 253 - 259
  • [13] Ordinal preference elicitation methods in health economics and health services research: using discrete choice experiments and ranking methods
    Ali, Shehzad
    Ronaldson, Sarah
    BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2012, 103 (01) : 21 - 44
  • [14] Better May be Worse: Some Monotonicity Results and Paradoxes in Discrete Choice Under Uncertainty
    Jörgen W. Weibull
    Lars-Göran Mattsson
    Mark Voorneveld
    Theory and Decision, 2007, 63 : 121 - 151
  • [15] Better may be worse: Some monotonicity results and paradoxes in discrete choice under uncertainty
    Weibull, Jorgen W.
    Mattsson, Lars-Goran
    Voorneveld, Mark
    THEORY AND DECISION, 2007, 63 (02) : 121 - 151
  • [16] Eliciting Health Care Preferences With Discrete Choice Experiments
    O'Hara, Nathan N.
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2022, 5 (04)
  • [17] SCOPE TESTS IN HEALTH CARE DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
    Poulos, C.
    Vass, C.
    Klein, K.
    Boeri, M.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2020, 23 : S320 - S320
  • [18] Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application
    Lancsar, Emily
    Louviere, Jordan
    Donaldson, Cam
    Currie, Gillian
    Burgess, Leonie
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2013, 76 : 74 - 82
  • [19] Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments
    van der Pol, M
    Cairns, J
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2001, 52 (09) : 1459 - 1470
  • [20] A Reporting Checklist for Discrete Choice Experiments in Health: The DIRECT Checklist
    Ride, Jemimah
    Goranitis, Ilias
    Meng, Yan
    La Bond, Christine
    Lancsar, Emily
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2024, 42 (10) : 1161 - 1175
12345