Randomized trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin microemulsion in renal transplantation

被引:0
|
作者
Richard Trompeter
Guido Filler
Nicholas J.A. Webb
Alan R. Watson
David V. Milford
Gunnar Tyden
Ryszard Grenda
Jan Janda
David Hughes
Jochen H.H. Ehrich
Bernd Klare
Graziella Zacchello
Inge Bjorn Brekke
Mary McGraw
Ferenc Perner
Lucian Ghio
Egon Balzar
Styrbjörn Friman
Rosanna Gusmano
Jochen Stolpe
机构
[1] Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario,
[2] University of Ottawa,undefined
[3] Ottawa,undefined
[4] Canada e-mail: filler@cheo.on.ca Tel.: +1-613-7383957,undefined
[5] Fax: +1-613-7384864,undefined
来源
Pediatric Nephrology | 2002年 / 17卷
关键词
Keywords Tacrolimus; Cyclosporin microemulsion; Pediatric renal transplant; Acute rejection; Graft survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (Tac) with the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin (CyA) in children undergoing renal transplantation. A 6-month, randomized, prospective, open, parallel group study with an open extension phase was conducted in 18 centers from nine European countries. In total, 196 pediatric patients (<18 years) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either Tac (n=103) or CyA microemulsion (n=93) administered concomitantly with azathioprine and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was incidence and time to first acute rejection. Baselinecharacteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Tac therapy resulted in a significantly lower incidence of acute re-jection (36.9%) compared with CyA therapy (59.1%) (P=0.003). The incidence of corticosteroid-resistant rejection was also significantly lower in the Tac group compared with the CyA group (7.8% vs. 25.8%, P=0.001). The differences were also significant for biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (16.5% vs. 39.8%, P<0.001). At 1 year, patient survival was similar (96.1% vs. 96.6%), while 10 grafts were lost in the Tac group compared with 17 graft losses in the CyA group (P=0.06). At 1 year, mean glomerular filtration rate (Schwartz estimate) was significantly higher in the Tac group (62±20 ml/min per 1.73 m2, n=84) than in the CyA group (56±21 ml/min per 1.73 m2, n=74, P=0.03). The most frequent adverse events during the first 6 months were hypertension (68.9% vs. 61.3%), hypomagnesemia (34.0% vs. 12.9%, P=0.001), and urinary tract infection (29.1% vs. 33.3%). Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were observed for diarrhea (13.6% vs. 3.2%), hypertrichosis (0.0% vs. 7.5%), flu syndrome (0.0% vs. 5.4%), and gum hyperplasia (0.0% vs. 5.4%). In previously non-diabetic children, the incidence of long-term (>30 days) insulin use was 3.0% (Tac) and 2.2% (CyA). Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease was observed in 1 patient in the Tac group and 2 patients in the CyA group. In conclusion, Tac was significantly more effective than CyA microemulsion in preventing acute rejection after renal transplantation in a pediatric population. The overall safety profiles of the two regimens were comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 149
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomised controlled trial comparing effects of cyclosporin and tacrolimus on bone mineral density post cadaveric renal transplantation
    Harding, K
    Stone, M
    Morris-Stiff, G
    Evans, W
    Jurewicz, WA
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 : S55 - S55
  • [42] Complete avoidance of calcineurin inhibitors in renal transplantation: A randomized trial comparing sirolimus and tacrolimus
    Larson, TS
    Dean, PG
    Stegall, MD
    Griffin, MD
    Textor, SC
    Schwab, TR
    Gloor, JM
    Cosio, FG
    Lund, WJ
    Kremers, WK
    Nyberg, SL
    Ishitani, MB
    Prieto, M
    Velosa, JA
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 6 (03) : 514 - 522
  • [43] A pharmacokinetic comparison of the corn oil versus microemulsion gelcap formulation of cyclosporin used de novo after renal transplantation
    Amante, AJ
    MeierKriesche, HU
    Schoenberg, L
    Kahan, BD
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 10 (03) : 217 - 222
  • [44] Kidney transplantation without calcineurin inhibitor drugs: A prospective, randomized trial of sirolimus versus cyclosporin
    Flechner, SM
    Goldfarb, D
    Modlin, C
    Feng, JY
    Krishnamurthi, V
    Mastroianni, B
    Savas, K
    Cook, DJ
    Novick, AC
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 74 (08) : 1070 - 1076
  • [45] Randomized trial of cyclosporine microemulsion (neoral) versus conventional cyclosporine in liver transplantation: MILTON study
    Otto, MG
    Mayer, AD
    Clavien, PA
    Cavallari, A
    Gunawardena, KA
    Mueller, EA
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) : 1632 - 1640
  • [46] Heme oxygenase activity in lymphocytes of renal transplantation patients treated with Cyclosporin/Tacrolimus
    Bakar, F.
    Keven, K.
    Tuzuner, A.
    Erbay, B.
    Nebioglu, S.
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2009, 276 : 300 - 300
  • [47] A pilot study of immunosuppressive monotherapy in liver transplantation: Tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin
    Rolles, K
    Davidson, BR
    Burroughs, AK
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (08) : 1195 - 1198
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporin microemulsion in primary SPK transplantation: 3-year results of the Euro-SPK 001 trial
    Saudek, F
    Malaise, J
    Boucek, P
    Adamec, M
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 : 3 - 10
  • [49] Long-term Follow-up of a Randomized Trial of Tacrolimus or Cyclosporine A Microemulsion in Children Post Liver Transplantation
    Lloyd, Carla
    Arshad, Adam
    Jara, Paloma
    Burdelski, Martin
    Gridelli, Bruno
    Manzanares, J.
    Colledan, Michele
    Jacquemin, Emmanuel
    Reding, Raymond
    Baumann, Ulrich
    Kelly, Deirdre
    TRANSPLANTATION DIRECT, 2021, 7 (10): : E765
  • [50] A multicenter, randomized trial of Simulect® versus Thymoglobuline® in renal transplantation.
    Lebranchu, Y
    de Ligny, BN
    Toupance, O
    Touchard, G
    Lemeur, Y
    Etienne, I
    Le Pogamp, P
    Rifle, G
    Moulin, B
    Reigneau, O
    Büchler, M
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 69 (08) : S258 - S258