Randomized trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporin microemulsion in renal transplantation

被引:0
|
作者
Richard Trompeter
Guido Filler
Nicholas J.A. Webb
Alan R. Watson
David V. Milford
Gunnar Tyden
Ryszard Grenda
Jan Janda
David Hughes
Jochen H.H. Ehrich
Bernd Klare
Graziella Zacchello
Inge Bjorn Brekke
Mary McGraw
Ferenc Perner
Lucian Ghio
Egon Balzar
Styrbjörn Friman
Rosanna Gusmano
Jochen Stolpe
机构
[1] Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario,
[2] University of Ottawa,undefined
[3] Ottawa,undefined
[4] Canada e-mail: filler@cheo.on.ca Tel.: +1-613-7383957,undefined
[5] Fax: +1-613-7384864,undefined
来源
Pediatric Nephrology | 2002年 / 17卷
关键词
Keywords Tacrolimus; Cyclosporin microemulsion; Pediatric renal transplant; Acute rejection; Graft survival;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus (Tac) with the microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin (CyA) in children undergoing renal transplantation. A 6-month, randomized, prospective, open, parallel group study with an open extension phase was conducted in 18 centers from nine European countries. In total, 196 pediatric patients (<18 years) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either Tac (n=103) or CyA microemulsion (n=93) administered concomitantly with azathioprine and corticosteroids. The primary endpoint was incidence and time to first acute rejection. Baselinecharacteristics were comparable between treatment groups. Tac therapy resulted in a significantly lower incidence of acute re-jection (36.9%) compared with CyA therapy (59.1%) (P=0.003). The incidence of corticosteroid-resistant rejection was also significantly lower in the Tac group compared with the CyA group (7.8% vs. 25.8%, P=0.001). The differences were also significant for biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (16.5% vs. 39.8%, P<0.001). At 1 year, patient survival was similar (96.1% vs. 96.6%), while 10 grafts were lost in the Tac group compared with 17 graft losses in the CyA group (P=0.06). At 1 year, mean glomerular filtration rate (Schwartz estimate) was significantly higher in the Tac group (62±20 ml/min per 1.73 m2, n=84) than in the CyA group (56±21 ml/min per 1.73 m2, n=74, P=0.03). The most frequent adverse events during the first 6 months were hypertension (68.9% vs. 61.3%), hypomagnesemia (34.0% vs. 12.9%, P=0.001), and urinary tract infection (29.1% vs. 33.3%). Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were observed for diarrhea (13.6% vs. 3.2%), hypertrichosis (0.0% vs. 7.5%), flu syndrome (0.0% vs. 5.4%), and gum hyperplasia (0.0% vs. 5.4%). In previously non-diabetic children, the incidence of long-term (>30 days) insulin use was 3.0% (Tac) and 2.2% (CyA). Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease was observed in 1 patient in the Tac group and 2 patients in the CyA group. In conclusion, Tac was significantly more effective than CyA microemulsion in preventing acute rejection after renal transplantation in a pediatric population. The overall safety profiles of the two regimens were comparable.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 149
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus/prednisone versus tacrolimus/prednisone mycophenolate mofetil in renal transplant recipients
    Shapiro, R
    Jordan, ML
    Scantlebury, VP
    Vivas, C
    Marsh, JM
    McCauley, J
    Johnston, J
    Randhawa, P
    Irish, W
    Gritsch, HA
    Naraghi, R
    Hakala, TR
    Fung, JJ
    Starzl, TE
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 67 (03) : 411 - 415
  • [32] A prospective, randomized comparative trial of mizoribine versus mycophenolate mofetil in combination therapy with tacrolimus for living donor renal transplantation
    Takahara, Shiro
    Takahashi, Kota
    Hasegawa, Akira
    Akiyama, Takahiro
    Uchida, Kazuharu
    Tanabe, Kazunari
    Amada, Noritoshi
    Toma, Hiroshi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 8 : 438 - 438
  • [33] Long term follow of children receiving Tacrolimus or Cyclosporin A-Microemulsion post liver transplantation
    Lloyd, C
    Jara, P
    de Goyet, JD
    Manzanares, J
    Lykavieris, P
    Becker, M
    Gridelli, B
    Burdelski, M
    Boillot, O
    Kelly, DA
    HEPATOLOGY, 2005, 42 (04) : 323A - 323A
  • [34] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF SHORT-TERM CYCLOSPORIN-A IN RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION
    WOOD, RFM
    THOMPSON, JF
    ALLEN, NH
    TING, A
    MORRIS, PJ
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1983, 70 (11) : 682 - 682
  • [35] Influence of cyclosporin, tacrolimus and rapamycin on renal function and arterial hypertension after renal transplantation
    Morales, JM
    Andres, A
    Rengel, M
    Rodicio, JL
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 16 : 121 - 124
  • [36] A pilot trial of sirolimus and tacrolimus in renal transplantation
    Jordan, ML
    Shapiro, R
    Scantlebury, V
    Vivas, CA
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 384 - 384
  • [37] Cardiovascular risk factors in renal transplant patients:: Cyclosporin A versus tacrolimus
    Ligtenberg, G
    Hené, RJ
    Blankestijn, PJ
    Koomans, HA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2001, 12 (02): : 368 - 373
  • [38] Cyclosporin Microemulsion (Neoral®)†A Pharmacoeconomic Review of its Use Compared with Standard Cyclosporin in Renal and Hepatic Transplantation
    Allan J. Coukell
    Greg L. Plosker
    PharmacoEconomics, 1998, 14 : 691 - 708
  • [39] Cyclosporin microemulsion (Neoral®) -: A pharmacoeconomic review of its use compared with standard cyclosporin in renal and hepatic transplantation
    Coukell, AJ
    Plosker, GL
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 1998, 14 (06) : 691 - 708
  • [40] Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin A: a comparative study on rat renal allograft survival
    Jiang, HS
    Sakuma, S
    Fujii, Y
    Akiyama, Y
    Ogawa, T
    Tamura, K
    Kobayashi, M
    Fujitsu, T
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 12 (02) : 92 - 99