A Framework for the Development of MaternalQuality of Care Indicators

被引:0
|
作者
Lisa M. Korst
Kimberly D. Gregory
Michael C. Lu
Carolina Reyes
Calvin J. Hobel
Gilberto F. Chavez
机构
[1] Saban Research Institute of Childrens Hospital Los Angeles,Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine
[2] University of Southern California,Division of Research on Children, Youth, and Families, Keck School of Medicine
[3] University of Southern California,Division of Neonatal medicine, Keck School of Medicine
[4] University of Southern California,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine
[5] University of Southern California,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine
[6] Burns and Allen Research Institute of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center,Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine
[7] University of Southern California,Division of Women's Health Services Research and Policy, David Geffen School of Medicine
[8] University of California,Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine
[9] University of California,Department of Community Health Services, School of Public Health
[10] University of California,undefined
[11] University of California,undefined
[12] California Department of Health Services,undefined
[13] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,undefined
[14] LAC+USC Women's and Children's Hospital,undefined
来源
关键词
quality indicators; health care; maternal health services; pregnancy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In collaboration with the California Department of Health Maternal and Child Health Branch, the authors formed a Working Group to identify potential clinical indicators that could be used to inform decision making regarding maternal health care quality. Objective: To develop potential indicators for the assessment of maternal health care quality. Materials and Methods: A Working Group was convened to review information from the published literature and expert opinion. Selection of potential indicators was guided by the following goals: 1) To identify key areas for routine aggregate monitoring; 2) To include perspectives of relevant stakeholders in maternal health care services; 3) To include measures that are comprehensive and reflect a balance between maternal and fetal interests; and 4) To develop measures that would be valid, generalizable, mutable, and feasible. Results: Ninety potential indicators were identified. Each underwent a thorough review based on: its definition, objective, and validity; its contribution to innovation; the cost and timeliness of implementation; its feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness; and its compatibility with ethics, values, and social policy. This process yielded 24 final indicators from the following categories: Health Status and Access (e.g., availability of 24 h inpatient anesthesia); Preconception and Interconception Care (e.g., Pap smear use); Antenatal Care (e.g., hospitalization for uncontrolled diabetes or pyelonephritis); Labor and Delivery Care (e.g., chorioamnionitis or obstetrical hemorrhage), and Postpartum Care (e.g., rate of postpartum visits). Conclusions: These potential indicators, representative of the women's health continuum, can serve as a foundation to structure the development of consensus and methods for maternal health care quality assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 341
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Development of a set of schizophrenia quality indicators for integrated care
    Weinmann, Stefan
    Roick, Christiane
    Martin, Luise
    Willich, Stefan
    Becker, Thomas
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA E PSICHIATRIA SOCIALE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRIC SCIENCES, 2010, 19 (01): : 52 - 62
  • [32] Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care
    Mariëlle Ouwens
    Rosella Hermens
    Marlies Hulscher
    Saskia Vonk-Okhuijsen
    Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen
    René Termeer
    Henri Marres
    Hub Wollersheim
    Richard Grol
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2010, 18 : 121 - 130
  • [33] The development of indicators to measure the quality of care in geriatric rehabilitation
    Veneberg, Bram
    Tijsen, Lian M. J.
    Wirtz, Maarten J.
    Zevenhuizen, Viola
    Buijck, Bianca, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2023, 35 (03)
  • [34] QUALITY CRITERIA FOR GLIOMA CARE: DEVELOPMENT OF CLINICAL INDICATORS
    Ho, V. K. Y.
    Gijtenbeek, J. M. M.
    Hanse, M. C. J.
    Hoenderdaal, P.
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 : 82 - 82
  • [35] DEVELOPMENT OF A RESEARCH TOOL - PATIENT INDICATORS OF NURSING CARE
    MAJESKY, SJ
    BRESTER, MH
    NISHIO, KT
    NURSING RESEARCH, 1978, 27 (06) : 365 - 371
  • [36] Development of a suite of indicators for quality improvement in maternity care
    Knight, H.
    Gurol-Urganci, I
    Cromwell, D.
    Mahmood, T.
    Templeton, A.
    Kiran, A.
    Richmond, D.
    van der Meulen, J.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 : 96 - 97
  • [37] Guideline based development of quality indicators for subfertility care
    Mourad, S. M.
    Hermens, R. P. M. G.
    Nelen, W. L. D. M.
    Braat, D. D. M.
    Grol, R. P. T. M.
    Kremer, J. A. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 : I100 - I101
  • [38] Development of Indicators to Assess Quality of Care for Prostate Cancer
    Nag, Nupur
    Millar, Jeremy
    Davis, Ian D.
    Costello, Shaun
    Duthie, James B.
    Mark, Stephen
    Delprado, Warick
    Smith, David
    Pryor, David
    Galvin, David
    Sullivan, Frank
    Murphy, Aine C.
    Roder, David
    Elsaleh, Hany
    Currow, David
    White, Craig
    Skala, Marketa
    Moretti, Kim L.
    Walker, Tony
    De Ieso, Paolo
    Brooks, Andrew
    Heathcote, Peter
    Frydenberg, Mark
    Thavaseelan, Jeffery
    Evans, Sue M.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2018, 4 (01): : 57 - 63
  • [39] Development of indicators for patient-centred cancer care
    Ouwens, Marielle
    Hermens, Rosella
    Hulscher, Marlies
    Vonk-Okhuijsen, Saskia
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne
    Termeer, Rene
    Marres, Henri
    Wollersheim, Hub
    Grol, Richard
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2010, 18 (01) : 121 - 130
  • [40] Development of quality of care indicators for Parkinson's disease
    Cheng, EM
    Siderowf, A
    Swarztrauber, K
    Eisa, M
    Lee, M
    Vickrey, BG
    ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 2003, 54 : S17 - S17