A Framework for the Development of MaternalQuality of Care Indicators

被引:0
|
作者
Lisa M. Korst
Kimberly D. Gregory
Michael C. Lu
Carolina Reyes
Calvin J. Hobel
Gilberto F. Chavez
机构
[1] Saban Research Institute of Childrens Hospital Los Angeles,Department of Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine
[2] University of Southern California,Division of Research on Children, Youth, and Families, Keck School of Medicine
[3] University of Southern California,Division of Neonatal medicine, Keck School of Medicine
[4] University of Southern California,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Keck School of Medicine
[5] University of Southern California,Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine
[6] Burns and Allen Research Institute of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center,Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine
[7] University of Southern California,Division of Women's Health Services Research and Policy, David Geffen School of Medicine
[8] University of California,Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine
[9] University of California,Department of Community Health Services, School of Public Health
[10] University of California,undefined
[11] University of California,undefined
[12] California Department of Health Services,undefined
[13] Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality,undefined
[14] LAC+USC Women's and Children's Hospital,undefined
来源
关键词
quality indicators; health care; maternal health services; pregnancy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: In collaboration with the California Department of Health Maternal and Child Health Branch, the authors formed a Working Group to identify potential clinical indicators that could be used to inform decision making regarding maternal health care quality. Objective: To develop potential indicators for the assessment of maternal health care quality. Materials and Methods: A Working Group was convened to review information from the published literature and expert opinion. Selection of potential indicators was guided by the following goals: 1) To identify key areas for routine aggregate monitoring; 2) To include perspectives of relevant stakeholders in maternal health care services; 3) To include measures that are comprehensive and reflect a balance between maternal and fetal interests; and 4) To develop measures that would be valid, generalizable, mutable, and feasible. Results: Ninety potential indicators were identified. Each underwent a thorough review based on: its definition, objective, and validity; its contribution to innovation; the cost and timeliness of implementation; its feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness; and its compatibility with ethics, values, and social policy. This process yielded 24 final indicators from the following categories: Health Status and Access (e.g., availability of 24 h inpatient anesthesia); Preconception and Interconception Care (e.g., Pap smear use); Antenatal Care (e.g., hospitalization for uncontrolled diabetes or pyelonephritis); Labor and Delivery Care (e.g., chorioamnionitis or obstetrical hemorrhage), and Postpartum Care (e.g., rate of postpartum visits). Conclusions: These potential indicators, representative of the women's health continuum, can serve as a foundation to structure the development of consensus and methods for maternal health care quality assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 341
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A conceptual framework for the OECD health care quality indicators project
    Arah, Onyebuchi A.
    Westert, Gert P.
    Hurst, Jeremy
    Klazinga, Niek S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 18 : 5 - 13
  • [22] A Framework for Assessing Quality Indicators for Cancer Care at the End of Life
    Seow, Hsien
    Snyder, Claire F.
    Mularski, Richard A.
    Shugarman, Lisa R.
    Kutner, Jean S.
    Lorenz, Karl A.
    Wu, Albert W.
    Dy, Sydney M.
    JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2009, 38 (06) : 903 - 912
  • [23] Development of a practical framework and indicators for monitoring integrated long-term health and care needs and service use
    Kim, Hongsoo
    Yoon, Nan-He
    Seo, Dongmin
    Kim, Yoon
    HEALTH POLICY, 2024, 149
  • [24] HDPI: A framework for pollution-sensitive human development indicators
    de la Vega M.C.L.
    Urrutia A.M.
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2001, 3 (3) : 199 - 215
  • [25] Resilience a means to development: A resilience assessment framework and a catalogue of indicators
    Mujjuni, F.
    Betts, T.
    To, L. S.
    Blanchard, R. E.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2021, 152
  • [26] Management framework for sustainable development indicators in the State of Selangor, Malaysia
    Hezri, AA
    Hasan, MN
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2004, 4 (04) : 287 - 304
  • [27] Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry
    Azapagic, A
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2004, 12 (06) : 639 - 662
  • [28] A FRAMEWORK FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE TOURISM IN COMMUNITIES
    Deery, Marg
    Jago, Leo
    Fredline, Liz
    TOURISM REVIEW INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 9 (01): : 69 - 77
  • [29] Development of quality indicators for health care in Differences of Sex Development (DSD)
    Juegense, Martina
    Rapp, Marion
    Schnoor, Maike
    Heidenreich, Andreas
    Doehnert, Uila
    Scherf, Jannick
    Hiort, Olaf
    Katalinic, Alexander
    SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 17 : 86 - 87
  • [30] Indicators of Family Care for Development for Use in Multicountry Surveys
    Kariger, Patricia
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    Engle, Patrice
    Britto, Pia M. Rebello
    Sywulka, Sara M.
    Menon, Purnima
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH POPULATION AND NUTRITION, 2012, 30 (04) : 472 - 486