Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi

被引:0
|
作者
Joshua D. Wiesenthal
Daniela Ghiculete
R. John D’A Honey
Kenneth T. Pace
机构
[1] St. Michael’s Hospital,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery
[2] University of Toronto,undefined
来源
Urological Research | 2010年 / 38卷
关键词
Shock wave lithotripsy; Predictors; Success; Urolithiasis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is considered the first line treatment for the majority of patients with renal and ureteric calculi, with success rates from contemporary series varying from 60 to 90%. Success is dependent on many patient and stone-related factors. We conducted a retrospective analysis of mean stone CT density (MSD) and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) to determine their influence on the success of SWL of renal and ureteric calculi. Data from all patients treated at the St. Michael’s Hospital Lithotripsy Unit from May 2004 to June 2009 were reviewed. Analysis was restricted to those patients with a pre-treatment non-contrast CT scan conducted at our center demonstrating a solitary renal or ureteric calculus ≤20 mm in maximal diameter. Successful treatment of renal stones was defined as those patients who were stone free or had asymptomatic, clinically insignificant residual fragments ≤4 mm in diameter, as measured by KUB X-ray, 3 months after a single SWL treatment. Successful treatment of ureteric stones was defined as being stone free on KUB X-ray, 2-weeks post-SWL. Demographic, stone, patient, treatment and follow-up data were collected from a prospective database and review of CT and KUB imaging by two independent urologists and one radiologist. Data were analyzed with logistic regression, Chi square analysis and ANOVA where appropriate. 422 patients (69.7% male) with a mean age of 51.4 years (SD 12.9) and mean BMI 27.0 kg/m2 (SD 4.9) were analyzed. Mean stone size was 78.9 mm2 (SD 77.3) for ureteral stones and 66.1 mm2 (SD 63.2) for renal stones, with 95 (43.6%) of the renal stones located in the lower pole. The single-treatment success rates for ureteral and renal stones were 62.3% and 68.8%, respectively. On univariate analysis, predictors of SWL success, regardless of stone location, were age (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.01), stone size (p < 0.01), MSD (p < 0.01) and SSD (p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, MSD >900 HU (OR = 0.49, CI: 0.32–0.75) and SSD >110 mm (OR = 0.49, CI: 0.31–0.78) were both significant predictors of outcome. We have identified in a large series of renal and ureteric calculi that both MSD and SSD can reliably predict SWL outcomes. This data can be used in combination with other patient and stone-related factors to facilitate optimal treatment-based decisions and provide patients with more accurate single-treatment success rates for SWL.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 313
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Predicting ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome by three-dimensional mean stone density
    Deguchi, R.
    Park, S-I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 82 - 82
  • [42] The Outcome of Extracorporel Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) in Upper Ureteric Stone Patients with Proximal Hydronephrosis
    Alsadoun, L.
    Abuelnaga, M.
    Elguindy, N.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 107 : 229 - 229
  • [43] Effects and outcome of Tamsulosin more than just stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi
    Qadri, Syed Saeed Uddin
    El Khalid, Salman
    Mahmud, Syed Mamun
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 64 (06) : 644 - 648
  • [44] A Clinical Nomogram to Predict the Successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Renal and Ureteral Calculi
    Wiesenthal, Joshua D.
    Ghiculete, Daniela
    Ray, A. Andrew
    Honey, R. John D'A.
    Pace, Kenneth T.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (02): : 556 - 562
  • [46] Outcomes of intracorporeal lithotripsy of upper tract stones is not affected by BMI and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) in obese and morbid patients
    Pompeo, Alexandre
    Molina, Wilson R.
    Juliano, Cesar
    Sehrt, David
    Kim, Fernando J.
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2013, 39 (05): : 702 - 709
  • [47] SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FOR URETERAL CALCULI, CAN WE IMPROVE STONE FREE RATES?
    Zelichenko, Genady
    Abdin, Tamer
    Shapur, Nandakishore
    Latke, Arie
    Landau, Ezikiel Harold
    Gofrit, Ofer Nathan
    Pode, Dov
    Duvdevani, Mordechai
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 : A346 - A347
  • [48] Emergency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: A study on feasibility and efficacy in stone clearance and reducing morbidity in ureteric and renal stones with colic
    Tiwari, Ashutosh Kumar
    Sarkar, Debansu
    Pal, Dilip Kumar
    UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2023, 90 (03) : 516 - 521
  • [49] Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for a ureteral stone in crossed fused renal ectopia
    Kato, M
    Ioritani, N
    Aizawa, M
    Inaba, Y
    Watanabe, R
    Orikasa, S
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 7 (07) : 270 - 273
  • [50] Tamsulosin is effective at facilitating expulsion of both renal and ureteric stone following extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis
    Saeb-Parsy, K.
    Wiseman, O. J.
    Lamb, A.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 113 : 61 - 61