Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi

被引:0
|
作者
Joshua D. Wiesenthal
Daniela Ghiculete
R. John D’A Honey
Kenneth T. Pace
机构
[1] St. Michael’s Hospital,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery
[2] University of Toronto,undefined
来源
Urological Research | 2010年 / 38卷
关键词
Shock wave lithotripsy; Predictors; Success; Urolithiasis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is considered the first line treatment for the majority of patients with renal and ureteric calculi, with success rates from contemporary series varying from 60 to 90%. Success is dependent on many patient and stone-related factors. We conducted a retrospective analysis of mean stone CT density (MSD) and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) to determine their influence on the success of SWL of renal and ureteric calculi. Data from all patients treated at the St. Michael’s Hospital Lithotripsy Unit from May 2004 to June 2009 were reviewed. Analysis was restricted to those patients with a pre-treatment non-contrast CT scan conducted at our center demonstrating a solitary renal or ureteric calculus ≤20 mm in maximal diameter. Successful treatment of renal stones was defined as those patients who were stone free or had asymptomatic, clinically insignificant residual fragments ≤4 mm in diameter, as measured by KUB X-ray, 3 months after a single SWL treatment. Successful treatment of ureteric stones was defined as being stone free on KUB X-ray, 2-weeks post-SWL. Demographic, stone, patient, treatment and follow-up data were collected from a prospective database and review of CT and KUB imaging by two independent urologists and one radiologist. Data were analyzed with logistic regression, Chi square analysis and ANOVA where appropriate. 422 patients (69.7% male) with a mean age of 51.4 years (SD 12.9) and mean BMI 27.0 kg/m2 (SD 4.9) were analyzed. Mean stone size was 78.9 mm2 (SD 77.3) for ureteral stones and 66.1 mm2 (SD 63.2) for renal stones, with 95 (43.6%) of the renal stones located in the lower pole. The single-treatment success rates for ureteral and renal stones were 62.3% and 68.8%, respectively. On univariate analysis, predictors of SWL success, regardless of stone location, were age (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.01), stone size (p < 0.01), MSD (p < 0.01) and SSD (p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, MSD >900 HU (OR = 0.49, CI: 0.32–0.75) and SSD >110 mm (OR = 0.49, CI: 0.31–0.78) were both significant predictors of outcome. We have identified in a large series of renal and ureteric calculi that both MSD and SSD can reliably predict SWL outcomes. This data can be used in combination with other patient and stone-related factors to facilitate optimal treatment-based decisions and provide patients with more accurate single-treatment success rates for SWL.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 313
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Three-dimensional mean stone density measurement is superior for predicting extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success
    Yamashita, Shimpei
    Kohjimoto, Yasuo
    Iwahashi, Yuya
    Iguchi, Takashi
    Iba, Akinori
    Nishizawa, Satoshi
    Hara, Isao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 (02) : 185 - 191
  • [22] Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy
    Williams, JC
    Saw, KC
    Paterson, RF
    Hatt, EK
    McAteer, JA
    Lingeman, JE
    UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (06) : 1092 - 1096
  • [23] Renal stone fragments following shock wave lithotripsy
    Zanetti, G
    Seveso, M
    Montanari, E
    Guarneri, A
    DelNero, A
    Nespoli, R
    Trinchieri, A
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02): : 352 - 355
  • [24] Effect of skin to stone distance on non-contrast computed tomography and mean attenuation value on the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in kidney stone disease
    Ahmadullah
    Panjwani, Sunil Kumar
    Malik, Muhammad Imran
    Memon, Mahmood Ahmed
    Ali, Shahzad
    Lashari, Mehran Khan
    RAWAL MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 47 (02): : 392 - 395
  • [25] Factors predicting the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteric calculi
    Farrands, R.
    Turney, B. W.
    Kumar, P. V. S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2011, 4 (06) : 243 - 247
  • [26] A CLINICAL NOMOGRAM PREDICTING THE SUCCESSFUL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY (SWL) TREATMENT OF RENAL AND URETERIC STONES
    Wiesenthal, J. D.
    Ghiculete, D.
    Ray, A. A.
    Pace, S.
    Honey, R. J. D.
    Pace, K. T.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A105 - A106
  • [27] Analyzing the Effect of Distance from Skin to Stone by Computed Tomography Scan on the Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Stone-Free Rate of Renal Stones
    Park, Byung-Hun
    Choi, Hoon
    Kim, Jin-Bum
    Chang, Young-Seop
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 53 (01) : 40 - 43
  • [28] THE EFFECT OF FAT AND NON-FAT COMPONENTS OF THE SKIN-TO-STONE DISTANCE ON SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY SUCCESS
    Hammad, Fayez T.
    Balakrishnan, Anita
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (04): : 587 - 587
  • [29] Stone-to-skin distance predicts success of shock-wave lithotripsy for kidney stones
    Rebecca Doherty
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2006, 3 (2): : 64 - 64
  • [30] Renal stone fragments following shock wave lithotripsy - Comment
    Streem, SB
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02): : 355 - 355