Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi

被引:0
|
作者
Joshua D. Wiesenthal
Daniela Ghiculete
R. John D’A Honey
Kenneth T. Pace
机构
[1] St. Michael’s Hospital,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery
[2] University of Toronto,undefined
来源
Urological Research | 2010年 / 38卷
关键词
Shock wave lithotripsy; Predictors; Success; Urolithiasis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is considered the first line treatment for the majority of patients with renal and ureteric calculi, with success rates from contemporary series varying from 60 to 90%. Success is dependent on many patient and stone-related factors. We conducted a retrospective analysis of mean stone CT density (MSD) and skin-to-stone distance (SSD) to determine their influence on the success of SWL of renal and ureteric calculi. Data from all patients treated at the St. Michael’s Hospital Lithotripsy Unit from May 2004 to June 2009 were reviewed. Analysis was restricted to those patients with a pre-treatment non-contrast CT scan conducted at our center demonstrating a solitary renal or ureteric calculus ≤20 mm in maximal diameter. Successful treatment of renal stones was defined as those patients who were stone free or had asymptomatic, clinically insignificant residual fragments ≤4 mm in diameter, as measured by KUB X-ray, 3 months after a single SWL treatment. Successful treatment of ureteric stones was defined as being stone free on KUB X-ray, 2-weeks post-SWL. Demographic, stone, patient, treatment and follow-up data were collected from a prospective database and review of CT and KUB imaging by two independent urologists and one radiologist. Data were analyzed with logistic regression, Chi square analysis and ANOVA where appropriate. 422 patients (69.7% male) with a mean age of 51.4 years (SD 12.9) and mean BMI 27.0 kg/m2 (SD 4.9) were analyzed. Mean stone size was 78.9 mm2 (SD 77.3) for ureteral stones and 66.1 mm2 (SD 63.2) for renal stones, with 95 (43.6%) of the renal stones located in the lower pole. The single-treatment success rates for ureteral and renal stones were 62.3% and 68.8%, respectively. On univariate analysis, predictors of SWL success, regardless of stone location, were age (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.01), stone size (p < 0.01), MSD (p < 0.01) and SSD (p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, MSD >900 HU (OR = 0.49, CI: 0.32–0.75) and SSD >110 mm (OR = 0.49, CI: 0.31–0.78) were both significant predictors of outcome. We have identified in a large series of renal and ureteric calculi that both MSD and SSD can reliably predict SWL outcomes. This data can be used in combination with other patient and stone-related factors to facilitate optimal treatment-based decisions and provide patients with more accurate single-treatment success rates for SWL.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 313
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi
    Wiesenthal, Joshua D.
    Ghiculete, Daniela
    Honey, R. John D'A
    Pace, Kenneth T.
    UROLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2010, 38 (04): : 307 - 313
  • [2] OUTCOME FROM SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY TO URETERIC CALCULI IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SKIN-TO-STONE DISTANCE
    Ramsey, Sara
    Wallace, Shirley
    Stephenson, Carolann
    Tolley, David
    Thomas, Ben
    Phipps, Simon
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E629 - E630
  • [3] Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy
    Perks, Alexandra E.
    Schuler, Trevor D.
    Lee, Jason
    GhIculete, Danlela
    Chung, Dae-Gyun
    Honey, R. John D'A
    Pace, Kenneth T.
    UROLOGY, 2008, 72 (04) : 765 - 769
  • [4] Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography
    Pareek, G
    Hedican, SP
    Lee, FT
    Nakada, SY
    UROLOGY, 2005, 66 (05) : 941 - 944
  • [6] Radiological determination of stone density and skin-to-stone distance-Can it predict the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?
    Pathak, Sanjeev
    Lavin, Victoria
    Vijay, Ram
    Basu, Shuvajit
    Salim, Ferekh
    Collins, Michael
    Hastie, Kenneth
    Hall, James
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2009, 2 (05) : 180 - 184
  • [7] Stone density and skin-to-stone distance in noncontrast computed tomography as prognostic indicators for the success of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease
    ElMoazen, Mohamed
    ElShafei, Ahmed M.
    Abdallah, Hany M.
    Elghobashy, Samir Elsayed
    Badawy, Mohamed Hussein
    Emam, Ahmed
    Gamal, Mohamed A.
    Gad, Hany H.
    Tawfeek, Ahmed M.
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 41 (04): : 1618 - 1629
  • [8] How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
    Gautier Müllhaupt
    Daniel S. Engeler
    Hans-Peter Schmid
    Dominik Abt
    BMC Urology, 15
  • [9] How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease?
    Muellhaupt, Gautier
    Engeler, Daniel S.
    Schmid, Hans-Peter
    Abt, Dominik
    BMC UROLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [10] Optimal Skin-to-Stone Distance Is a Positive Predictor for Successful Outcomes in Upper Ureter Calculi following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach
    Cho, Kang Su
    Do Jung, Hae
    Ham, Won Sik
    Chung, Doo Yong
    Kang, Yong Jin
    Jang, Won Sik
    Kwon, Jong Kyou
    Choi, Young Deuk
    Lee, Joo Yong
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (12):