Quantifying the effect of gate errors on variational quantum eigensolvers for quantum chemistry

被引:0
|
作者
Kieran Dalton
Christopher K. Long
Yordan S. Yordanov
Charles G. Smith
Crispin H. W. Barnes
Normann Mertig
David R. M. Arvidsson-Shukur
机构
[1] Hitachi Cambridge Laboratory,Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics
[2] University of Cambridge,Department of Physics
[3] ETH Zürich,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Variational quantum eigensolvers (VQEs) are leading candidates to demonstrate near-term quantum advantage. Here, we conduct density-matrix simulations of leading gate-based VQEs for a range of molecules. We numerically quantify their level of tolerable depolarizing gate-errors. We find that: (i) The best-performing VQEs require gate-error probabilities between 10−6 and 10−4 (10−4 and 10−2 with error mitigation) to predict, within chemical accuracy, ground-state energies of small molecules with 4 − 14 orbitals. (ii) ADAPT-VQEs that construct ansatz circuits iteratively outperform fixed-circuit VQEs. (iii) ADAPT-VQEs perform better with circuits constructed from gate-efficient rather than physically-motivated elements. (iv) The maximally-allowed gate-error probability, pc, for any VQE to achieve chemical accuracy decreases with the number NII of noisy two-qubit gates as pc∝~NII−1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${p}_{c}\mathop{\propto }\limits_{\displaystyle{ \sim }}{N}_{{{{\rm{II}}}}}^{-1}$$\end{document}. Additionally, pc decreases with system size, even with error mitigation, implying that larger molecules require even lower gate-errors. Thus, quantum advantage via gate-based VQEs is unlikely unless gate-error probabilities are decreased by orders of magnitude.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Full quantum eigensolvers based on variance
    Li, Ruo-Nan
    Tao, Yuan-Hong
    Liang, Jin-Min
    Wu, Shu-Hui
    Fei, Shao-Ming
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 2024, 99 (09)
  • [42] Benchmarking of different optimizers in the variational quantum algorithms for applications in quantum chemistry
    Singh, Harshdeep
    Majumder, Sonjoy
    Mishra, Sabyashachi
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 159 (04):
  • [43] Quantum simulation of excited states from parallel contracted quantum eigensolvers
    Benavides-Riveros, Carlos L.
    Wang, Yuchen
    Warren, Samuel
    Mazziotti, David A.
    NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2024, 26 (03):
  • [44] Magic state distillation and gate compilation in quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry
    Trout, Colin J.
    Brown, Kenneth R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUANTUM CHEMISTRY, 2015, 115 (19) : 1296 - 1304
  • [45] Quantum chemistry with excited state variational principles
    Neuscamman, Eric
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2019, 258
  • [46] Training variational quantum algorithms with random gate activation
    Liu S.
    Zhang S.-X.
    Jian S.-K.
    Yao H.
    Physical Review Research, 2023, 5 (03):
  • [47] Avoiding symmetry roadblocks and minimizing the measure-ment overhead of adaptive variational quantum eigensolvers
    Shkolnikov, V. O.
    Mayhall, Nicholas J.
    Economou, Sophia E.
    Barnes, Edwin
    QUANTUM, 2023, 7
  • [48] Influences of Gate Operation Errors in the Quantum Counting Algorithm
    Qing Ai
    Yan-Song Li
    Gui-Lu Long
    Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 2006, 21 : 927 - 932
  • [49] Influences of gate operation errors in the quantum counting algorithm
    Ai, Qing
    Li, Yan-Song
    Long, Gui-Lu
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 21 (06) : 927 - 931
  • [50] Gate-count estimates for performing quantum chemistry on small quantum computers
    Wecker, Dave
    Bauer, Bela
    Clark, Bryan K.
    Hastings, Matthew B.
    Troyer, Matthias
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2014, 90 (02)