Validation of pharmacogenetic algorithms and warfarin dosing table in Egyptian patients

被引:0
|
作者
Naglaa Samir Bazan
Nirmeen Ahmed Sabry
Amal Rizk
Sherif Mokhtar
Osama Badary
机构
[1] Cairo University Hospitals,Critical Care Medicine Department
[2] Cairo University,Faculty of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Department
[3] Cairo University,Faculty of Medicine, Critical Care Medicine Department
[4] Cairo University,Faculty of Medicine, Critical Care Medicine Department
[5] Ain Shams University,Faculty of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Department
关键词
CYP2C9; Dosage; Dosing algorithms; Dosing table; Egypt; Pharmacogenetics; VKORC1; Warfarin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background Warfarin remains a difficult drug to use due to the large variability in dose response. Clear understanding of the accuracy of warfarin pharmacogenetic dosing methods might lead to appropriate control of anticoagulation. Objective This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of warfarin dosing table and two pharmacogenetic algorithms, namely the algorithms of Gage et al. (Clin Pharmacol Ther 84:326–331, 2008), and the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium algorithm (IWPC) in a real Egyptian clinical setting. Additionally, three non-pharmacogenetic dosing methods (the Gage, IWPC clinical algorithms and the empiric 5 mg/day dosing) were evaluated. Setting Sixty-three Egyptian patients on a stable therapeutic warfarin dose were included. Patients were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the critical care medicine department. Methods CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms were genotyped by real time PCR system. Predicted doses by all dosing methods were calculated and compared with the actual therapeutic warfarin doses. Results The Gage algorithm (adjusted R2 = 0.421, and mean absolute error (MAE) = 3.3), and IWPC algorithm (adjusted R2 = 0.419, MAE = 3.2) produced better accuracy than did the warfarin dosing table (adjusted R2 = 0.246, MAE = 3.5), the two clinical algorithms (R2 = 0.24, MAE = 3.7) and the fixed dose approach (MAE = 3.9). However, all dosing models produced comparable clinical accuracy with respect to proportion of patients within 1 mg/day of actual dose (ideal dose). Non-pharmacogenetic methods severely over-predicted dose (defined as ≥2 mg/day more than actual dose) compared to the three pharmacogenetic models. In comparison to non-pharmacogenetic methods, the three pharmacogenetic models performed better regarding the low dose group in terms of percentage of patients within ideal dose. In the high dose group, none of the dosing models predicted warfarin doses within ideal dose. Conclusion Our study showed that genotype-based dosing improved prediction of warfarin therapeutic dose beyond that available with the fixed-dose approach or the clinical algorithms, especially in the low-dose group. However, the two pharmacogenetic algorithms were the most accurate.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 844
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of pharmacogenetic algorithms and warfarin dosing table in Egyptian patients
    Bazan, Naglaa Samir
    Sabry, Nirmeen Ahmed
    Rizk, Amal
    Mokhtar, Sherif
    Badary, Osama
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2012, 34 (06) : 837 - 844
  • [2] Pharmacogenetic Warfarin Dosing Algorithms: Validity in Egyptian Patients
    Selim, Tarek E.
    Azzam, Hanan A.
    Ghoneim, Hayam R.
    Mohamed, Ahmed A.
    El Wakeel, Hossam
    Abu Bakr, Helmy M.
    [J]. ACTA HAEMATOLOGICA, 2018, 139 (04) : 255 - 262
  • [3] Validation of Warfarin Pharmacogenetic Testing and Dosing Algorithm
    Fang, M.
    Roper, N.
    Walsh, S.
    Bona, R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2008, 10 (06): : 567 - 567
  • [4] Validation and Comparison of Pharmacogenetics-Based Warfarin Dosing Algorithms for Application of Pharmacogenetic Testing
    Roper, Nitin
    Storer, Barry
    Bona, Robert
    Fang, Min
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2010, 12 (03): : 283 - 291
  • [5] Validation of warfarin pharmacogenetic algorithms in 586 Han Chinese patients
    Peng, Qi
    Huang, Shujun
    Chen, Xiaoying
    Yuan, Yayan
    Yu, Yajun
    Tao, Liang
    Zhang, Zhenlu
    Xu, Mousheng
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2015, 16 (13) : 1465 - 1474
  • [6] Comparative accuracy of pharmacogenetic warfarin dosing algorithms and the warfarin dosing label plus clinical judgment
    Labinov, Yana
    DiDomenico, Robert
    Nutescu, Edith A.
    Cavallari, Larisa H.
    [J]. PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2013, 33 (10): : E190 - E190
  • [7] Validation of warfarin pharmacogenetic algorithms in clinical practice
    Marin-Leblanc, Melina
    Perreault, Sylvie
    Bahroun, Imen
    Lapointe, Mathieu
    Mongrain, Ian
    Provost, Sylvie
    Turgeon, Jacques
    Talajic, Mario
    Brugada, Ramon
    Phillips, Michael
    Tardif, Jean-Claude
    Dube, Marie-Pierre
    [J]. PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2012, 13 (01) : 21 - 29
  • [8] Pharmacogenetic-Based Warfarin Dosing: Simplified Pharmacogenetic Tables vs. Pharmacogenetic Algorithms
    Finkelman, Brian S.
    Gage, Brian F.
    Johnson, Julie A.
    Brensinger, Colleen M.
    Kimmel, Stephen E.
    [J]. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2010, 19 : S114 - S114
  • [9] Which of Algorithms of Warfarin Dosing Based on Results of Pharmacogenetic Testing is Suitable for Patients in Russia?
    Sychev, D. A.
    Antonov, I. M.
    Kropacheva, E. S.
    Panchenko, E. P.
    [J]. KARDIOLOGIYA, 2010, 50 (04) : 35 - 37
  • [10] Pharmacogenetic Testing for Warfarin Dosing Still Awaits Validation Reply
    Epstein, Robert S.
    Moyer, Thomas P.
    Aubert, Ronald E.
    O'Kane, Dennis J.
    Xia, Fang
    Teagarden, J. Russell
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2011, 57 (06) : 756 - 757