Validation of pharmacogenetic algorithms and warfarin dosing table in Egyptian patients

被引:0
|
作者
Naglaa Samir Bazan
Nirmeen Ahmed Sabry
Amal Rizk
Sherif Mokhtar
Osama Badary
机构
[1] Cairo University Hospitals,Critical Care Medicine Department
[2] Cairo University,Faculty of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Department
[3] Cairo University,Faculty of Medicine, Critical Care Medicine Department
[4] Cairo University,Faculty of Medicine, Critical Care Medicine Department
[5] Ain Shams University,Faculty of Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy Department
关键词
CYP2C9; Dosage; Dosing algorithms; Dosing table; Egypt; Pharmacogenetics; VKORC1; Warfarin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background Warfarin remains a difficult drug to use due to the large variability in dose response. Clear understanding of the accuracy of warfarin pharmacogenetic dosing methods might lead to appropriate control of anticoagulation. Objective This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of warfarin dosing table and two pharmacogenetic algorithms, namely the algorithms of Gage et al. (Clin Pharmacol Ther 84:326–331, 2008), and the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium algorithm (IWPC) in a real Egyptian clinical setting. Additionally, three non-pharmacogenetic dosing methods (the Gage, IWPC clinical algorithms and the empiric 5 mg/day dosing) were evaluated. Setting Sixty-three Egyptian patients on a stable therapeutic warfarin dose were included. Patients were recruited from the outpatient clinic of the critical care medicine department. Methods CYP2C9 and VKORC1 polymorphisms were genotyped by real time PCR system. Predicted doses by all dosing methods were calculated and compared with the actual therapeutic warfarin doses. Results The Gage algorithm (adjusted R2 = 0.421, and mean absolute error (MAE) = 3.3), and IWPC algorithm (adjusted R2 = 0.419, MAE = 3.2) produced better accuracy than did the warfarin dosing table (adjusted R2 = 0.246, MAE = 3.5), the two clinical algorithms (R2 = 0.24, MAE = 3.7) and the fixed dose approach (MAE = 3.9). However, all dosing models produced comparable clinical accuracy with respect to proportion of patients within 1 mg/day of actual dose (ideal dose). Non-pharmacogenetic methods severely over-predicted dose (defined as ≥2 mg/day more than actual dose) compared to the three pharmacogenetic models. In comparison to non-pharmacogenetic methods, the three pharmacogenetic models performed better regarding the low dose group in terms of percentage of patients within ideal dose. In the high dose group, none of the dosing models predicted warfarin doses within ideal dose. Conclusion Our study showed that genotype-based dosing improved prediction of warfarin therapeutic dose beyond that available with the fixed-dose approach or the clinical algorithms, especially in the low-dose group. However, the two pharmacogenetic algorithms were the most accurate.
引用
收藏
页码:837 / 844
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Accuracy assessment of pharmacogenetic algorithms for warfarin dose prediction in Chinese patients
    Lei, Xiaoying
    Guo, Yanhai
    Sun, Jianbin
    Zhou, Heping
    Liu, Yonglan
    Liang, Ping
    Yan, Zhen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2012, 87 (05) : 541 - 544
  • [42] Warfarin dose prediction in children using pharmacometric bridging-comparison with published pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms
    Hamberg, Anna-Karin
    Friberg, Lena E.
    Hanseus, Katarina
    Ekman-Joelsson, Britt-Marie
    Sunnegardh, Jan
    Jonzon, Anders
    Lundell, Bo
    Jonsson, E. Niclas
    Wadelius, Mia
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 69 (06) : 1275 - 1283
  • [43] Erratum to: Warfarin dose prediction in children using pharmacometric bridging – comparison with published pharmacogenetic dosing algorithms
    Anna-Karin Hamberg
    Lena E. Friberg
    Katarina Hanséus
    Britt-Marie Ekman-Joelsson
    Jan Sunnegårdh
    Anders Jonzon
    Bo Lundell
    E. Niclas Jonsson
    Mia Wadelius
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2013, 69 : 1737 - 1737
  • [44] Warfarin dosing algorithm using clinical, demographic and pharmacogenetic data from Chinese patients
    Joyce H. S. You
    Raymond S. M. Wong
    Mary M. Y. Waye
    Yawei Mu
    Cadmon K. Lim
    Kai-chow Choi
    Gregory Cheng
    [J]. Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis, 2011, 31 : 113 - 118
  • [45] Modern warfarin-dosing algorithms in patients with atrial fibrillation
    Kolesnyk, M. Yu.
    Mykhaylovskyi, Ya. M.
    [J]. ZAPOROZHYE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2015, (06) : 81 - 87
  • [46] Warfarin dosing algorithm using clinical, demographic and pharmacogenetic data from Chinese patients
    You, Joyce H. S.
    Wong, Raymond S. M.
    Waye, Mary M. Y.
    Mu, Yawei
    Lim, Cadmon K.
    Choi, Kai-chow
    Cheng, Gregory
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2011, 31 (01) : 113 - 118
  • [47] Pharmacogenetic-driven Warfarin Dosing Algorithm in Puerto Ricans
    Ramos-Morales, Alga
    Alejandro, Yirelia
    Vazquez, Joan
    Valentin, Ivette
    Rivera, Giselle
    Cruz, Iadelisse
    Renta, Jessica
    Cadilla, Carmen
    Duconge, Jorge
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS, 2013, 35 (03) : 417 - 417
  • [48] PHARMACOGENETIC-DRIVEN WARFARIN DOSING ALGORITHM IN PUERTO RICANS
    Ramos-Morales, Alga S.
    Alejandro-Cowan, Yirelia
    Vazquez, Joan
    Valentin, Ivette
    Rivera, Giselle
    Cruz, Iadelisse
    Cadilla, Carmen
    Renta, Jessica
    Duconge, Jorge
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2014, 89 (06) : E4 - E4
  • [49] Pharmacogenetic-Driven Warfarin Dosing Algorithm in Puerto Ricans
    Ramos, Alga
    Rivera, Giselle
    Garcia, Rafael
    Alejandro, Yirelia
    Cruz, Iadelisse
    Renta, Jessica
    Feliu, Juan
    Cadilla, Carmen
    Seip, Richard
    Ruano, Gualberto
    Duconge, Jorge
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY, 2012, 87 : S152 - S153
  • [50] Clinical and economic consequences of pharmacogenetic-guided dosing of warfarin
    Verhoef, Talitha I.
    Schalekamp, Tom
    Redekop, William K.
    de Boer, Anthonius
    Maitland-van der Zee, Anke-Hilse
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2010, 10 (04) : 375 - 378