共 50 条
Feasibility of a combined aerobic and cognitive training intervention on cognitive function in cancer survivors: A pilot investigation
被引:21
|作者:
Peterson B.M.
[1
,3
]
Johnson C.
[4
]
Case K.R.
[4
]
Shackelford D.Y.K.
[2
,3
]
Brown J.M.
[2
,3
]
Lalonde T.L.
[5
]
Hayward R.
[3
]
机构:
[1] Biola University, Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, 13800 Biola Ave., La Mirada, 90639, CA
[2] Carroll University, Department of Exercise Science, 100 N. East Ave., Waukesha, 53186, WI
[3] University of Northern Colorado Cancer Rehabilitation Institute, University of Northern Colorado, School of Sport and Exercise Science, 501 W. 20th St., Greeley, 80639, CO
[4] University of Northern Colorado, School of Psychological Sciences, Greeley, CO
[5] University of Northern Colorado, Department of Applied Statistics and Research Methods, Greeley, CO
关键词:
Cancer;
Cancer-related cognitive impairment;
Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment;
Cognitive function;
Exercise;
D O I:
10.1186/s40814-018-0242-3
中图分类号:
学科分类号:
摘要:
Background: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) may negatively affect upwards of 75% of cancer patients. Exercise and cognitive training, independently, may increase functional capacity and aspects of cognitive function. Yet, combined training protocols have not been evaluated in cancer survivor populations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of a quasi-randomized, controlled, exploratory, repeated-measures aerobic and cognitive training intervention on cognitive function in participants undergoing treatment for cancer (N = 28). Methods: Pre- and post-physical and cognitive assessments were administered. A 36-session (approximately 12 weeks) computer-based cognitive (COG), aerobic (AER), cognitive and aerobic (AER + COG), and flexibility (CON) training intervention was completed. Dependent measures t tests and pre- to post percentages were then calculated to address within-group changes for each dependent variable. Results: Within-group measures revealed that the AER logical memory scores (pre- to post mean difference [2.3], 95.0% CI [0.9, 3.7], percentage change [32.7%]), delayed recall scores (pre- to post mean difference [2.1], 95.0% CI [0.3, 3.9], percentage change [27.2%]), block design scores (pre- to post mean difference [1.7], 95.0% CI [0.2, 3.2], percentage change [19.0%]), and letter-number sequencing scores (pre- to post mean difference [1.0], 95.0% CI [0.2, 1.8], percentage change [12.3%]) all increased. Aspects of verbal fluidity scores increased in the CON group. However, all cognitive scores (AER + COG and COG groups) failed to increase. Conclusions: Aerobic training for CRCI may positively impact cognitive function. Individually, these methods may appropriately address CRCI, but combined training of this nature may be too demanding for patients undergoing treatment for cancer. However, larger randomized trials are needed to substantiate this protocol in large-scale cancer rehabilitation centers. © 2018 The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文