Comparison of styrene removal in air by positive and negative DC corona discharges

被引:0
|
作者
X. Zhang
W. Feng
Z. Yu
S. Li
J. Zhu
K. Yan
机构
[1] Zhejiang University,Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Key Laboratory of Biomass Chemical Engineering of Ministry of Education
关键词
Corona discharge; Non-thermal plasma; Styrene; VOCs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This communication discusses styrene removal in air by positive and negative DC corona discharges. Experiments were performed with a wire-plate reactor and under a gas flow rate of 305 m3/h. In terms of averaged applied voltage and corona current, it is observed that the maximum negative corona current is always at least two times larger than the positive one at the same voltage level. At the same corona discharge energy density, however, the positive corona discharge produces around 2–6 times more ozone in comparison with the negative corona. For styrene removal, the positive corona processing is also around 2–6 times more effective than the negative corona. Humidity, an important and variable component of ambient air, affects the positive corona processing significantly. But it exerts a moderate effect on the negative corona. The differences between positive corona and negative corona discharges are attributed to their different discharge properties.
引用
收藏
页码:1377 / 1382
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of styrene removal in air by positive and negative DC corona discharges
    Zhang, X.
    Feng, W.
    Yu, Z.
    Li, S.
    Zhu, J.
    Yan, K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 10 (06) : 1377 - 1382
  • [2] Model of the negative DC corona plasma: Comparison to the positive DC corona plasma
    Chen, JH
    Davidson, JH
    [J]. PLASMA CHEMISTRY AND PLASMA PROCESSING, 2003, 23 (01) : 83 - 102
  • [3] Model of the Negative DC Corona Plasma: Comparison to the Positive DC Corona Plasma
    Junhong Chen
    Jane H. Davidson
    [J]. Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing, 2003, 23 : 83 - 102
  • [4] Streamer Propagation of Positive and Negative Pulsed Corona Discharges in Air
    Teramoto, Yoshiyuki
    Fukumoto, Yuki
    Ono, Ryo
    Oda, Tetsuji
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2011, 39 (11) : 2218 - 2219
  • [5] Ionic wind produced by positive and negative corona discharges in air
    Moreau, Eric
    Audier, Pierre
    Benard, Nicolas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROSTATICS, 2018, 93 : 85 - 96
  • [6] Experimental investigation of negative DC corona on conductor bundles: A comparison with positive corona
    Bousiou, E. I.
    Mikropoulos, P. N.
    Zagkanas, V. N.
    [J]. 2017 52ND INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (UPEC), 2017,
  • [7] Comparison between Positive and Negative Corona Discharges by Hydrodynamic Plasma Simulations
    Zogning, Calvin
    Lobry, Jacques
    Moiny, Francis
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2020 INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ELECTRICAL INSULATING MATERIALS (ISEIM 2020), 2020, : 552 - 560
  • [8] Comparison of Toluene Removal in Air at Atmospheric Conditions by Different Corona Discharges
    Schiorlin, Milko
    Marotta, Ester
    Rea, Massimo
    Paradisi, Cristina
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 43 (24) : 9386 - 9392
  • [9] Simulation of Negative and Positive Corona Discharges in Air for Investigation of Electromagnetic Waves Propagation
    Javandel, Vahid
    Akbari, Asghar
    Ardebili, Mohammad
    Werle, Peter
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE, 2022, 50 (09) : 3169 - 3177
  • [10] Influence of humidity on pulse shape parameters of positive corona discharges in air at DC voltage
    Luehring, Ulrich
    Wienold, Daniel
    Jenau, Frank
    [J]. 2017 1ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND 2017 17TH IEEE INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEMS EUROPE (EEEIC / I&CPS EUROPE), 2017,