Dissociable effects of irrelevant context on 2D and 3D grasping

被引:0
|
作者
Aviad Ozana
Tzvi Ganel
机构
[1] Ben-Gurion University of the Negev,Department of Psychology
来源
关键词
Effect of stimulus range; Perception and action; Two-dimensional objects; Object perception; Contextual processing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Grasping movements directed toward real objects are typically unaffected by irrelevant aspects of the object and its surroundings, indicating that such interactions are based on analytic processing of object shape and size. However, recent findings show that grasping directed toward two-dimensional (2D) objects is subjected to perceptually mediated effects of relative shape and size. It is unclear however, whether context-dependent processing—a hallmark of visual perception—affects 2D grasping in the same fashion. Here, we explored this possibility by comparing the influence of a newly discovered contextual effect on 2D and on 3D grasping. According to the range of standard effect (RSE), the perceptual resolution for a stimulus depends on the range of the other stimuli presented within the same session, with higher resolution obtained under narrow compared to wide context range. In two experiments, participants were asked to grasp 3D and 2D objects embedded in a wide or a narrow range. The results showed that, unlike 3D grasping, which was immune to contextual information, the resolution during 2D grasping was significantly modulated by the range of the irrelevant context. The findings suggest that visuomotor control directed to 2D objects is intruded by irrelevant perceptual information, making it context-dependent
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 575
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] 2D AND 3D CALCULATION OF FORCES
    BARTSCH, M
    WEILAND, T
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1994, 30 (05) : 3467 - 3470
  • [42] Integrated 2D and 3D mammography
    Sumkin, Jules H.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2013, 14 (08): : E292 - E293
  • [43] Discretization in 2D and 3D orders
    Couprie, M
    Bertrand, G
    Kenmochi, Y
    GRAPHICAL MODELS, 2003, 65 (1-3) : 77 - 91
  • [44] Comparing 2D and 3D Imaging
    Ballantyne, Lauren
    JOURNAL OF VISUAL COMMUNICATION IN MEDICINE, 2011, 34 (03) : 138 - 141
  • [45] 2D and 3D Roughness Characterization
    Magsipoc, Earl
    Zhao, Qi
    Grasselli, Giovanni
    ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2020, 53 (03) : 1495 - 1519
  • [46] 2D AND 3D PERSPECTIVE TRANSFORMATIONS
    KORNEL, K
    COMPUTERS & GRAPHICS, 1990, 14 (01) : 117 - 124
  • [47] 2D vision in a 3D System
    Flinders, M
    INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND COMPUTER VISION XX: ALGORITHMS, TECHNIQUES, AND ACTIVE VISION, 2001, 4572 : 422 - 426
  • [48] 2D/3D switchable displays
    Dekker, T.
    de Zwart, S. T.
    Willemsen, O. H.
    Hiddink, M. G. H.
    IJzerman, W. L.
    LIQUID CRYSTAL MATERIALS, DEVICES, AND APPLICATIONS XI, 2006, 6135
  • [49] Caging for 2D and 3D micromanipulation
    David J. Cappelleri
    Zhenbo Fu
    Michael Fatovic
    Journal of Micro-Nano Mechatronics, 2012, 7 (4): : 115 - 129
  • [50] A 3D view on 2D materials
    Novoselov, Kostya
    Demming, Anna
    PHYSICS WORLD, 2019, 32 (05) : 15 - 15