Labels affect both liking and preference: the better the stimuli, the bigger the preference

被引:0
|
作者
Debra A. Zellner
Kaila Hoer
Juliann Feldman
机构
[1] Montclair State University,Department of Psychology
来源
关键词
Attention; Olfaction; Smell; Hedonic contrast; Preference;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When hedonic contrast causes stimuli to become less good, it also reduces subjects’ preferences between them (hedonic condensation). Here we investigated whether the reduction in preference is a by-product of hedonic contrast or can occur as a result of other manipulations that increase the negativity of the stimuli. Subjects smelled and rated their degrees of preference for each of two sets of paired cheese samples (some subjects were told that they were smelling cheeses, and the others, body odor samples). They then smelled each of the four samples, labeled as before, one at a time, and rated their intensity and liking for each sample. We found no effect of label on the intensity ratings, but subjects who were told that the samples were body odor liked them less and showed less of a preference between paired samples. Thus, increasing the negativity of pairs of stimuli reduces subjects’ preference between them, even in the absence of hedonic contrast. More-negative stimuli might be attended to less than more-positive stimuli, resulting in less hedonic discrimination of hedonically negative than of positive stimuli.
引用
收藏
页码:2189 / 2192
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An alternative way to uncover drivers of coffee liking: Preference mapping based on consumers' preference ranking and open comments
    Varela, Paula
    Beltran, Julian
    Fiszman, Susana
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2014, 32 : 152 - 159
  • [42] Paired preference tests: 'Liking', 'Buying' and 'Take Away' preferences
    Wichchukit, Sukanya
    O'Mahony, Michael
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2010, 21 (08) : 925 - 929
  • [43] Using both emotional responses and sensory attribute intensities to predict consumer liking and preference toward vegetable juice products
    Samant, Shilpa S.
    Seo, Han-Seok
    FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2019, 73 : 75 - 85
  • [44] LENGTH OF FAMILIARIZATION AND PREFERENCE FOR NOVEL AND FAMILIAR STIMULI
    LASKY, RE
    INFANT BEHAVIOR & DEVELOPMENT, 1980, 3 (01): : 15 - 28
  • [45] Correlations among stimuli affect stimulus matching and stimulus liking
    Pimenta, Dioghenes
    Tonneau, Francois
    BEHAVIOURAL PROCESSES, 2016, 130 : 36 - 38
  • [46] A review of methods of assessing preference for social stimuli
    Morris, Samuel L. L.
    Gallagher, Madison L. L.
    Allen, Alva E. E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2023, : 416 - 427
  • [47] PREFERENCE FOR COMPLEX STIMULI AS AN INDEX OF DIVERSIVE EXPLORATION
    DENT, OB
    SIMMEL, EC
    PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 1968, 26 (3P1) : 896 - &
  • [48] The Role of Effort in Shifting Preference for Feedback Stimuli
    Sleiman, Andressa A.
    Gravina, Nicole E.
    Robinson, Theo, II
    Podlesnik, Christopher A.
    JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR MANAGEMENT, 2020, 40 (1-2) : 30 - 45
  • [49] The effect of temporally spaced responding on preference for stimuli
    Tsukamoto, Masashi
    Kohara, Ken-ichiro
    Takeuchi, Koji
    ICCSBS 2014 - THE ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE - SOCIAL, AND BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES, 2014, 1 : 201 - 206
  • [50] Dynamic stimuli: Accentuating aesthetic preference biases
    Friedrich, Trista E.
    Harms, Victoria L.
    Elias, Lorin J.
    LATERALITY, 2014, 19 (05): : 549 - 559