Labels affect both liking and preference: the better the stimuli, the bigger the preference

被引:0
|
作者
Debra A. Zellner
Kaila Hoer
Juliann Feldman
机构
[1] Montclair State University,Department of Psychology
来源
关键词
Attention; Olfaction; Smell; Hedonic contrast; Preference;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When hedonic contrast causes stimuli to become less good, it also reduces subjects’ preferences between them (hedonic condensation). Here we investigated whether the reduction in preference is a by-product of hedonic contrast or can occur as a result of other manipulations that increase the negativity of the stimuli. Subjects smelled and rated their degrees of preference for each of two sets of paired cheese samples (some subjects were told that they were smelling cheeses, and the others, body odor samples). They then smelled each of the four samples, labeled as before, one at a time, and rated their intensity and liking for each sample. We found no effect of label on the intensity ratings, but subjects who were told that the samples were body odor liked them less and showed less of a preference between paired samples. Thus, increasing the negativity of pairs of stimuli reduces subjects’ preference between them, even in the absence of hedonic contrast. More-negative stimuli might be attended to less than more-positive stimuli, resulting in less hedonic discrimination of hedonically negative than of positive stimuli.
引用
收藏
页码:2189 / 2192
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Effect of high pressure on the consumer liking and preference of yoghurt
    Capellas, M
    Noronha, R
    Mor-Mur, M
    Needs, E
    HIGH PRESSURE RESEARCH, 2002, 22 (3-4) : 701 - 704
  • [22] When likeness goes with liking: The case of political preference
    Caprara, Gian Vittorio
    Vecchione, Michele
    Barbaranelli, Claudio
    Fraley, R. Chris
    POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 28 (05) : 609 - 632
  • [23] Interest, but not liking, drives consumer preference toward novelty
    Sung, Billy
    Vanman, Eric
    Hartley, Nicole
    AUSTRALASIAN MARKETING JOURNAL, 2019, 27 (04): : 242 - 248
  • [24] COMPARISON OF DIAZEPAM AND OXAZEPAM - PREFERENCE, LIKING AND EXTENT OF ABUSE
    GRIFFITHS, RR
    MCLEOD, DR
    BIGELOW, GE
    LIEBSON, IA
    ROACHE, JD
    NOWOWIESKI, P
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY AND EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS, 1984, 229 (02): : 501 - 508
  • [25] BETTER DECISIONS WITH PREFERENCE THEORY
    HAMMOND, JS
    HARVARD BUSINESS REVIEW, 1967, 45 (06) : 123 - 141
  • [26] The curious case of productivity orientation: The influence of advertising stimuli on affect and preference for subscription boxes
    Toteva, Irina T.
    Lutz, Richard J.
    Shaw, Eric H.
    JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2021, 63
  • [27] Collaborative Preference Embedding against Sparse Labels
    Bao, Shilong
    Xu, Qianqian
    Ma, Ke
    Yang, Zhiyong
    Cao, Xiaochun
    Huang, Qingming
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMEDIA (MM'19), 2019, : 2079 - 2087
  • [28] SIMILARITY AND PREFERENCE JUDGMENTS OF MUSICAL STIMULI
    CUPCHIK, GC
    RICKERT, M
    MENDELSON, J
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 23 (04) : 273 - 282
  • [29] ADRENALIN STIMULATION AND PREFERENCE FOR FAMILIAR STIMULI
    LEVENTHAL, GS
    KILLACKEY, H
    JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 65 (01) : 152 - +
  • [30] Preference Learning Labels by Anchoring on Consecutive Annotations
    Naini, Abinay Reddy
    Salman, Ali N.
    Busso, Carlos
    INTERSPEECH 2023, 2023, : 1898 - 1902