Implicit and hybrid methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study

被引:0
|
作者
Julio Pena
Gonzalo Nápoles
Yamisleydi Salgueiro
机构
[1] Central University of Las Villas,Center of Studies of Computational Mechanics and Numerical Methods in Engineering
[2] Universiteit Hasselt,Faculty of Business Economics
[3] Tilburg University,Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence
[4] Universidad de Talca,Department of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Engineering
来源
关键词
Attribute weighting; Multiple attribute decision making; Implicit weighting methods; Hybrid weighting methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Attribute weighting is a task of paramount relevance in multi-attribute decision-making (MADM). Over the years, different approaches have been developed to face this problem. Despite the effort of the community, there is a lack of consensus on which method is the most suitable one for a given problem instance. This paper is the second part of a two-part survey on attribute weighting methods in MADM scenarios. The first part introduced a categorization in five classes while focusing on explicit weighting methods. The current paper addresses implicit and hybrid approaches. A total of 20 methods are analyzed in order to identify their strengths and limitations. Toward the end, we discuss possible alternatives to address the detected drawbacks, thus paving the road for further research directions. The implicit weighting with additional information category resulted in the most coherent approach to give effective solutions. Consequently, we encourage the development of future methods with additional preference information.
引用
收藏
页码:3817 / 3847
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Advantage matrix: two novel multi-attribute decision-making methods and their applications
    Yu, Bin
    Xu, Zeshui
    [J]. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2022, 55 (06) : 4463 - 4484
  • [42] Advantage matrix: two novel multi-attribute decision-making methods and their applications
    Bin Yu
    Zeshui Xu
    [J]. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2022, 55 : 4463 - 4484
  • [43] Application of decomposition multi-attribute methods AHP and ANP in financial decision-making
    Zmeskal, Zdenek
    [J]. MANAGING AND MODELLING OF FINANCIAL RISKS - 6TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2012, : 689 - 699
  • [44] A FUZZY MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING METHOD UNDER RISK WITH UNKNOWN ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS
    Han, Zuosheng
    Liu, Peide
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2011, 17 (02) : 246 - 258
  • [45] Intelligent multi-attribute decision making
    [J]. Binggong Xuebao, 1 (90-93):
  • [46] Hybrid Multi-attribute Decision Making Based on Vague Sets
    Wang Haixia
    Yang Aiping
    Dai Wenzhan
    [J]. 2010 8TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (WCICA), 2010, : 5140 - 5144
  • [47] Multi-attribute decision-making based on soft set theory: a systematic review
    Khameneh, Azadeh Zahedi
    Kilicman, Adem
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2019, 23 (16) : 6899 - 6920
  • [48] Multi-attribute decision-making based on soft set theory: a systematic review
    Azadeh Zahedi Khameneh
    Adem Kılıçman
    [J]. Soft Computing, 2019, 23 : 6899 - 6920
  • [49] Neutrosophic VIKOR approach for multi-attribute group decision-making
    Tooranloo, Hossein Sayyadi
    Ayatollah, Arezoo Sadat
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND DECISIONS, 2024, 34 (02) : 121 - 134
  • [50] Monte Carlo method for interval multi-attribute decision-making
    Yu, Yongsheng
    Diao, Lianwang
    [J]. Dongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Southeast University (Natural Science Edition), 2008, 38 (01): : 187 - 190