Implicit and hybrid methods for attribute weighting in multi-attribute decision-making: a review study

被引:0
|
作者
Julio Pena
Gonzalo Nápoles
Yamisleydi Salgueiro
机构
[1] Central University of Las Villas,Center of Studies of Computational Mechanics and Numerical Methods in Engineering
[2] Universiteit Hasselt,Faculty of Business Economics
[3] Tilburg University,Department of Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence
[4] Universidad de Talca,Department of Computer Sciences, Faculty of Engineering
来源
关键词
Attribute weighting; Multiple attribute decision making; Implicit weighting methods; Hybrid weighting methods;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Attribute weighting is a task of paramount relevance in multi-attribute decision-making (MADM). Over the years, different approaches have been developed to face this problem. Despite the effort of the community, there is a lack of consensus on which method is the most suitable one for a given problem instance. This paper is the second part of a two-part survey on attribute weighting methods in MADM scenarios. The first part introduced a categorization in five classes while focusing on explicit weighting methods. The current paper addresses implicit and hybrid approaches. A total of 20 methods are analyzed in order to identify their strengths and limitations. Toward the end, we discuss possible alternatives to address the detected drawbacks, thus paving the road for further research directions. The implicit weighting with additional information category resulted in the most coherent approach to give effective solutions. Consequently, we encourage the development of future methods with additional preference information.
引用
收藏
页码:3817 / 3847
页数:30
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Novel Method of Hybrid Multi-Attribute Decision Making
    Wang, Cheng
    Liu, Huanbin
    Li, Ping
    [J]. FIFTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 353 - 356
  • [22] Multi-Attribute Decision-Making for Intrusion Detection Systems: A Systematic Review
    Alamleh, Amneh
    Albahri, O. S.
    Zaidan, A. A.
    Alamoodi, A. H.
    Albahri, A. S.
    Zaidan, B. B.
    Qahtan, Sarah
    Binti Ismail, Amelia Ritahani
    Malik, R. Q.
    Baqer, M. J.
    Jasim, Ali Najm
    Al-Samarraay, Mohammed S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2023, 22 (01) : 589 - 636
  • [23] Multi-attribute decision-making based on the SPIFGIA operators
    Wang C.
    Fu X.
    Meng S.
    He Y.
    [J]. Granular Computing, 2017, 2 (4) : 321 - 331
  • [24] Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Ship Structural Design
    Pereira, Tiago
    Garbatov, Yordan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (08)
  • [25] Multi-attribute Decision-making in Economics of Fire Protection
    Vaidogas, Egidijus Rytas
    Sakenaite, Jurgita
    [J]. INZINERINE EKONOMIKA-ENGINEERING ECONOMICS, 2011, 22 (03): : 262 - 270
  • [26] MULTI-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING USING CONSTRAINED CRITERIA
    SCHENKERMAN, S
    [J]. COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1977, 4 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [27] Multi-attribute decision-making in individual and social choice
    Bossert, W
    Peters, H
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2000, 40 (03) : 327 - 339
  • [28] Multi-attribute decision-making method with subjective preference
    Wang, JQ
    Liu, XJ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2001 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOLS I AND II, 2001, : 582 - 585
  • [29] Situational variables and sustainability in multi-attribute decision-making
    Simpson, Bonnie J. K.
    Radford, Scott K.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 2014, 48 (5-6) : 1046 - 1069
  • [30] Study on Public Emergency Decision-making Based on the Fuzzy Multi-attribute Group Decision-making
    Wang Shaoyu
    Liu Jia
    [J]. SELECTED PAPERS FROM IDRC ON RISK REDUCTION AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 1 : 128 - 133