Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software

被引:0
|
作者
Emily Lancsar
Denzil G. Fiebig
Arne Risa Hole
机构
[1] Monash University,Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School
[2] University of New South Wales,School of Economics
[3] University of Sheffield,Department of Economics
来源
PharmacoEconomics | 2017年 / 35卷
关键词
Mixed Logit; Supplementary Appendix; Preference Heterogeneity; Scale Heterogeneity; Choice Occasion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We provide a user guide on the analysis of data (including best–worst and best–best data) generated from discrete-choice experiments (DCEs), comprising a theoretical review of the main choice models followed by practical advice on estimation and post-estimation. We also provide a review of standard software. In providing this guide, we endeavour to not only provide guidance on choice modelling but to do so in a way that provides a ‘way in’ for researchers to the practicalities of data analysis. We argue that choice of modelling approach depends on the research questions, study design and constraints in terms of quality/quantity of data and that decisions made in relation to analysis of choice data are often interdependent rather than sequential. Given the core theory and estimation of choice models is common across settings, we expect the theoretical and practical content of this paper to be useful to researchers not only within but also beyond health economics.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 716
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Latent variables in discrete choice experiments
    Rungie, Cam M.
    Coote, Leonard V.
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2012, 5 (3.) : 145 - 156
  • [32] Strategic bias in discrete choice experiments
    Meginnis, Keila
    Burton, Michael
    Chan, Ron
    Rigby, Dan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 109
  • [33] Effects coding in discrete choice experiments
    Bech, M
    Gyrd-Hansen, D
    HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2005, 14 (10) : 1079 - 1083
  • [34] Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments
    Norman, Richard
    Craig, Benjamin M.
    Hansen, Paul
    Jonker, Marcel F.
    Rose, John
    Street, Deborah J.
    Mulhern, Brendan
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2019, 12 (03): : 281 - 285
  • [35] A methodology to guide writing Software Requirements Specification document
    Soares, Hecio A.
    Moura, Raimundo S.
    2015 XLI LATIN AMERICAN COMPUTING CONFERENCE (CLEI), 2015, : 616 - 626
  • [36] Specification of software controlling a discrete-continuous environment
    Friesen, V
    Jahnichen, S
    Weber, M
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1997 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 1997, : 315 - 325
  • [37] Robust Estimation in Software Experiments
    Software Engineering Notes, 22 (04):
  • [38] Preference heterogeneity in energy discrete choice experiments: A review on methods for model selection
    Sagebiel, Julian
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 69 : 804 - 811
  • [39] Bayesian procedures as a numerical tool for the estimation of an intertemporal discrete choice model
    Peter Haan
    Daniel Kemptner
    Arne Uhlendorff
    Empirical Economics, 2015, 49 : 1123 - 1141
  • [40] Estimation and application of a Bayesian network model for discrete travel choice analysis
    Xie, Chi
    Waller, S. Travis
    TRANSPORTATION LETTERS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2010, 2 (02): : 125 - 144