Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software

被引:0
|
作者
Emily Lancsar
Denzil G. Fiebig
Arne Risa Hole
机构
[1] Monash University,Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School
[2] University of New South Wales,School of Economics
[3] University of Sheffield,Department of Economics
来源
PharmacoEconomics | 2017年 / 35卷
关键词
Mixed Logit; Supplementary Appendix; Preference Heterogeneity; Scale Heterogeneity; Choice Occasion;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We provide a user guide on the analysis of data (including best–worst and best–best data) generated from discrete-choice experiments (DCEs), comprising a theoretical review of the main choice models followed by practical advice on estimation and post-estimation. We also provide a review of standard software. In providing this guide, we endeavour to not only provide guidance on choice modelling but to do so in a way that provides a ‘way in’ for researchers to the practicalities of data analysis. We argue that choice of modelling approach depends on the research questions, study design and constraints in terms of quality/quantity of data and that decisions made in relation to analysis of choice data are often interdependent rather than sequential. Given the core theory and estimation of choice models is common across settings, we expect the theoretical and practical content of this paper to be useful to researchers not only within but also beyond health economics.
引用
收藏
页码:697 / 716
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Choice certainty, consistency, and monotonicity in discrete choice experiments
    Mattmann, Matteo
    Logar, Ivana
    Brouwer, Roy
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2019, 8 (02) : 109 - 127
  • [22] Preference Stability and Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Dan Rigby
    Michael Burton
    Jo Pluske
    Environmental and Resource Economics, 2016, 65 : 441 - 461
  • [23] Varying choice set sizes in discrete choice experiments
    Akinc, Deniz
    Street, Deborah J.
    Vandebroek, Martina
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2024, 52
  • [24] Preference Stability and Choice Consistency in Discrete Choice Experiments
    Rigby, Dan
    Burton, Michael
    Pluske, Jo
    ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2016, 65 (02): : 441 - 461
  • [25] A strategic network choice model for global container flows: specification, estimation and application
    Tavasszy, Lorant
    Minderhoud, Michiel
    Perrin, Jean-Francois
    Notteboom, Theo
    JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 19 (06) : 1163 - 1172
  • [26] QUARTERLY ECONOMETRIC MODEL OF PORTFOLIO CHOICE .1. SPECIFICATION AND ESTIMATION PROBLEMS
    SHARPE, I
    ECONOMIC RECORD, 1973, 49 (128) : 518 - 533
  • [27] Issues in the Design of Discrete Choice Experiments
    Richard Norman
    Benjamin M. Craig
    Paul Hansen
    Marcel F. Jonker
    John Rose
    Deborah J. Street
    Brendan Mulhern
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2019, 12 : 281 - 285
  • [28] Optimal design for discrete choice experiments
    Grasshoff, Ulrike
    Grossmann, Heiko
    Holling, Heinz
    Schwabe, Rainer
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2013, 143 (01) : 167 - 175
  • [29] Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis
    Louviere, Jordan J.
    Flynn, Terry N.
    Carson, Richard T.
    JOURNAL OF CHOICE MODELLING, 2010, 3 (03) : 57 - 72
  • [30] RISK COMMUNICATION FOR DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS
    Weissler, E.
    Wallace, M. J.
    Yang, J. C.
    Brotzman, L. E.
    Corriere, M. A.
    Ea, Secemsky
    Sutphin, J.
    Johnson, R.
    Gonzalez, J.
    Me, Tarver
    Saha, A.
    Gebben, D.
    Chen, A. L.
    Malone, M.
    Farb, A.
    Zikmund-Fisher, B. J.
    Reed, S.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2022, 25 (07) : S556 - S556