Measuring Loss Aversion under Ambiguity: A Method to Make Prospect Theory Completely Observable

被引:0
|
作者
Mohammed Abdellaoui
Han Bleichrodt
Olivier L’Haridon
Dennie van Dolder
机构
[1] HEC-Paris GREGHEC-CNRS,Nottingham School of Economics
[2] Erasmus School of Economics,undefined
[3] Crem-Université de Rennes 1 & GREGHEC,undefined
[4] University of Nottingham,undefined
来源
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty | 2016年 / 52卷
关键词
Prospect theory; Loss aversion; Utility for gains and losses; Risk; Ambiguity; Elicitation methods; C91; D03; D81;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We propose a simple, parameter-free method that, for the first time, makes it possible to completely observe Tversky and Kahneman’s (1992) prospect theory. While methods exist to measure event weighting and the utility for gains and losses separately, there was no method to measure loss aversion under ambiguity. Our method allows this and thereby it can measure prospect theory’s entire utility function. Consequently, we can properly identify properties of utility and perform new tests of prospect theory. We implemented our method in an experiment and obtained support for prospect theory. Utility was concave for gains and convex for losses and there was substantial loss aversion. Both utility and loss aversion were the same for risk and ambiguity, as assumed by prospect theory, and sign-comonotonic trade-off consistency, the central condition of prospect theory, held.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Prospect theory and insurance demand: Empirical evidence on the role of loss aversion
    Hwang, In Do
    JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 95
  • [12] Loss aversion, framing, and bargaining: The implications of prospect theory for international conflict
    Levy, JS
    INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1996, 17 (02) : 179 - 195
  • [13] An experimental test of prospect theory for predicting choice under ambiguity
    Kothiyal, Amit
    Spinu, Vitalie
    Wakker, Peter P.
    JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 2014, 48 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [14] An experimental test of prospect theory for predicting choice under ambiguity
    Amit Kothiyal
    Vitalie Spinu
    Peter P. Wakker
    Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2014, 48 : 1 - 17
  • [15] A theory of price adjustment under loss aversion
    Ahrens, Steffen
    Pirschel, Inske
    Snower, Dennis J.
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2017, 134 : 78 - 95
  • [16] Drivers of digital currency adoption and their configurational impact assessment in tourism and hospitality: loss aversion under prospect theory
    Han, Heesup
    Ayalew, Zemenu Amare
    Kim, Seongseop
    Quan, Wei
    Lho, Linda Heejung
    Jung, Inyoung
    Al-Ansi, Amr
    CURRENT ISSUES IN TOURISM, 2024,
  • [17] INFLUENCE OF LEVEL OF STUDY AND GENDER ON RISK AVERSION AND LOSS ACCORDING TO PROSPECT THEORY
    Harzer, Jorge Harry
    Francisco Maffezzolli, Eliane Cristine
    Souza, Alceu
    da Silva, Wesley Vieira
    SISTEMAS & GESTAO, 2016, 11 (04): : 355 - 366
  • [18] Estimating parametric loss aversion with prospect theory: Recognising and dealing with size dependence
    Balcombe, Kelvin
    Bardsley, Nicholas
    Dadzie, Sam
    Fraser, Lain
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2019, 162 : 106 - 119
  • [19] Loss Aversion Robust Optimization Model Under Distribution and Mean Return Ambiguity
    Wang, Jia
    Zhou, Mengchu
    Guo, Xiwang
    Qi, Liang
    Wang, Xu
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL SOCIAL SYSTEMS, 2023, 10 (06) : 3252 - 3261
  • [20] The prospects for prospect theory: An empirical evaluation of international relations applications of framing and loss aversion
    Boettcher, WA
    POLITICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 25 (03) : 331 - 362