Loss Aversion Robust Optimization Model Under Distribution and Mean Return Ambiguity

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Jia [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Mengchu [3 ]
Guo, Xiwang [4 ]
Qi, Liang [5 ]
Wang, Xu [6 ]
机构
[1] Northeastern Univ, Sch Business Adm, Shenyang 110819, Peoples R China
[2] Northeastern Univ Qinhuangdao, Sch Econ, Qinhuangdao 066004, Hebei, Peoples R China
[3] New Jersey Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Newark, NJ 07102 USA
[4] Liaoning Shihua Univ, Coll Comp & Commun Engn, Fushun 113001, Peoples R China
[5] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Comp Sci & Engn, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
[6] Hebei Univ Environm Engn, Coll Econ, Qinhuangdao 066102, Hebei, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Portfolios; Loss measurement; Uncertainty; Investment; Computational modeling; Analytical models; Symbols; Ambiguity aversion; behavioral finance; human behavior; loss aversion; robust optimization; PORTFOLIO CHOICE; PROSPECT-THEORY; DECISION; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1109/TCSS.2022.3195816
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
From the aspect of behavioral finance, which is an emerging area integrating human behavior into finance, this work studies a robust portfolio problem for loss-averse investors under distribution and mean return ambiguity. A loss-aversion distributionally-robust optimization model is constructed if the return distribution of risky assets is unknown. Then, under the premise that the mean returns of risky assets belong to an ellipsoidal uncertainty set, a model under joint ambiguity in distribution and mean returns is constructed. This study solves both robust models and derives their analytical solutions, respectively. Moreover, the effect of ambiguity aversion and loss aversion on robust optimal portfolio returns is studied. The results show that ambiguity-neutral investors who do not know the return distribution obtain more robust optimal portfolio returns than ambiguity-averse investors who are unaware of both the distribution and mean return. The difference between them decreases with the increase of loss aversion coefficients and increases with ambiguity aversion coefficients. Both loss aversion and ambiguity aversion play important roles in investors' behavioral portfolio selection.
引用
收藏
页码:3252 / 3261
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robust portfolio choice with CVaR and VaR under distribution and mean return ambiguity
    Pac, A. Burak
    Pinar, Mustafa C.
    [J]. TOP, 2014, 22 (03) : 875 - 891
  • [2] Robust portfolio choice with CVaR and VaR under distribution and mean return ambiguity
    A. Burak Paç
    Mustafa Ç. Pınar
    [J]. TOP, 2014, 22 : 875 - 891
  • [3] Mean semi-deviation from a target and robust portfolio choice under distribution and mean return ambiguity
    Pinar, Mustafa C.
    Pac, A. Burak
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2014, 259 : 394 - 405
  • [4] A Soft Robust Model for Optimization Under Ambiguity
    Ben-Tal, Aharon
    Bertsimas, Dimitris
    Brown, David B.
    [J]. OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (04) : 1220 - 1234
  • [5] An Ambiguity Aversion Model for Decision Making under Ambiguity
    Ma, Wenjun
    Luo, Xudong
    Jiang, Yuncheng
    [J]. THIRTY-FIRST AAAI CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2017, : 614 - 621
  • [6] Myopic Loss Aversion under Ambiguity and Gender Effects
    Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Inigo
    Ponti, Giovanni
    Tomas, Josefa
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [7] Robust mean-to-CVaR optimization under ambiguity in distributions means and covariance
    Lotfi, Somayyeh
    Zenios, Stavros A.
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2024, 18 (07) : 2115 - 2140
  • [8] Portfolio optimization under loss aversion
    Fulga, Cristinca
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 251 (01) : 310 - 322
  • [9] Robust equilibrium excess-of-loss reinsurance and CDS investment strategies for a mean-variance insurer with ambiguity aversion
    Zhao, Hui
    Shen, Yang
    Zeng, Yan
    Zhang, Wenjun
    [J]. INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2019, 88 : 159 - 180
  • [10] Robust portfolio optimization with a generalized expected utility model under ambiguity
    Ma X.
    Zhao Q.
    Qu J.
    [J]. Annals of Finance, 2008, 4 (4) : 431 - 444